27
Comments (6)
sorted by:
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Monsieur_Novembre 1 point ago +1 / -0

Defamation?

1
Dessert4TWO69 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, that was talked about on here, to great acclaim if I recall. Just like the people telling everyone here to bring guns to D.C. screw their laws.

And me, I just kept getting downvoted for pointing out the obvious.

2
Monsieur_Novembre 2 points ago +2 / -0

The left openly calls for execution of any conservatives on mainstream sites like Slate and Salon, and the portland antifa tweeter crowd is even worse, but the few voices remaining on the right calling them out (andyngo, posobiec) are being labelled as far-right white supremacists, while many others have been shut down recently for "doxing" publically available information (antifawatch2, kittylists). In every movement every side has extremists, but I don't think that anyone here would approve taking congressmen hostages. It's just that it is easier for them to slap a "far-right extremist" label on a Trump follower (like that pos author of the tweets here if you look at his history) and no one will complain. Social media is killing diversity of opinions. And btw I do agree that bringing guns to DC is indeed a stupid idea as they serve no purpose there.

1
Dessert4TWO69 1 point ago +1 / -0

You said defamation. Which means lying about someone to their detriment...

1
Monsieur_Novembre 1 point ago +1 / -0

That tweet unjustly harms the reputation of the site by implying it harbors domestic terrorists, while in fact code 230 protects it from contents posted here by the users.