33
Comments (25)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Piroko 1 point ago +1 / -0

how many walmarts, targets, starbucks, gas stations, mcdonalds, burger kings, and the like are there in Texas

And you think there won't be those businesses in secession?

Business doesn't care about politics.

Most of those businesses operate on a franchise model. That means the business is not "national walmart" or "national mcdonalds" but rather "Houston area restaurant chain operator".

In secession, that won't change.

For example, in Des Moines, all the McDonalds are controlled by Raccoon Valley Parners, which is an Iowa based investment group that controls a bunch of restaurants... in Iowa.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Piroko 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you even read what I said?

these huge corporations who would not be able to operate both places

They're not "huge" corporations.

They're huge franchises. You're missing the difference. A franchise business has only nominal loyalty to its brand.

Consider: Bennigans does not exist. It went bankrupt years ago.

There is a Bennigans in Des Moines today. It still exists. They still serve the same menu they did.

Consider: Blockbuster does not exist. It went bankrupt years ago.

There is a Blockbuster in Oregon. They post regularly to twitter.

I'm done with this conversation because you're a moron. You have no experience and understanding of how the world actually works.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Piroko 1 point ago +1 / -0

... I was going to block you, and if your next reply is as dumb I will. But I wanted to respond to this one because you raised an interesting company.

AT&T

In secession, AT&T's assets in Texas would be offered the following choice:

"Cooperate, or be nationalized by force."