Rand Paul is one member of Congress that I trust the most. I disagree with him sometimes, but his actions are always based on the Constitution in my knowledge, even not objecting to the certifications today. His reasoning is a good one, but it failed to consider the fact that he is a check and balance toward the other branches of government, and the other branches (both federal and State) are not performing their own Constitutional duties.
I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.
Rand Paul is one member of Congress that I trust the most. I disagree with him sometimes, but his actions are always based on the Constitution in my knowledge, even not objecting to the certifications today. His reasoning is a good one, but it failed to consider the fact that he is a check and balance toward the other branches of government, and the other branches (both federal and State) are not performing their own Constitutional duties.
they certified elections that were run in violation of the Constitution, besides demonstrably corrupt and fraudulent.
I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1346936086191288323
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.