I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.
they certified elections that were run in violation of the Constitution, besides demonstrably corrupt and fraudulent.
I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1346936086191288323
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.