I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.
I'm not saying his decision was correct, I personally disagree with it. However, his reasoning was based on the Constitution, which you can read here...
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1346936086191288323
As I said, he failed to account for his role as a check and balance. His reasoning is sound assuming that everyone does their Constitutional duties, but they didn't. That's where his argument is lacking.