It's an interesting lens to see things through. It mostly works. It's a decent explanation of things going on. Interesting perspective and lens to view things through anyway.
Personally, I'm a little questionable on the whole philosophy. I actually think Niestzche himself may have been a proponent of slave morality in the enlightenment era values he promoted in order to bring down the master morality of the Catholic Church. He of course flipped it and said the opposite to make himself seem like the master moralist but I'd actually disagree with him on that one. I think many of the values he promoted have actually led to the degradation of our society and have aided the left's slave morality push in their leftism take over society so overall, I don't like a lot of what he promoted.
It's an interesting lens to see things through. It mostly works. It's a decent explanation of things going on. Interesting perspective and lens to view things through anyway.
Personally, I'm a little questionable on the whole philosophy. I actually think Niestzche himself may have been a proponent of slave morality in the enlightenment era values he promoted in order to bring down the master morality of the Catholic Church. He of course flipped it and said the opposite to make himself seem like the master moralist but I'd actually disagree with him on that one. I think many of the values he promoted have actually led to the degradation of our society and have aided the left's slave morality push in their leftism take over society so overall, I don't like a lot of what he promoted.
He does make a good point about Christians having slave morality