Democracy: The God That Failed /// THE TIME FOR SECESSION HAS FINALLY COME!
(en.wikipedia.org)
⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
Comments (13)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Yes. This is a redpill many on here need to swallow. Democracy is not a good system. Many on here will say but we have a Constitutional Republic not a Democracy. That's you basically saying Gala Apples are significantly different than McIntosh Apples. It's still an apple.
The biggest problem with western democracies is universal suffrage. You can have a constitutional republic but you should significantly limit the number of people who can vote. This is how the USA was in its inception. It was the move toward universal suffrage that has destroyed western societies.
"...democracy will in practice lead to the destruction of a people's true values. And this also serves to explain how it is that people with a great past from the time when they surrender themselves to the unlimited, democratic rule of the masses slowly lose their former position; for the outstanding achievements of individuals...are now rendered practically ineffective through the oppression of mere numbers."
"Democracy is the canal through which bolshevism lets its poisons flow into the separate countries and lets work there long enough for these infections to lead to a crippling of intelligence and of the force of resistance."
You may not like who said the above quotes, Adolf Hitler, but he was damn right about democracy.
Democracy only works in small voluntary villages where everyone goes to Town Hall to debate, and anyone who doesn't agree with the majority is free to leave. It doesn't scale beyond that.
You need Constitutional Republics to control larger territory, with strict limits on what they are authorized to do. The Federal government was only supposed to protect the border and keep the
redcoatscommies from invading. The US Constitution tried to establish that - it failed.Agreed but with one more stipulation. The constitutional republic with a limitation on who can vote. Examples of limitations would be the following:
Implement restrictions like this then your constitutional republic works. As soon as you make it universal suffrage, it is only marginally better than democracy.
I think the best idea is to have multiple tiers of voting, and multiple legislative chambers. Like in US, the Senate represents the states equally, while the House represents the population. Should've had at least a third chamber, representing the taxpayers - ONE DOLLAR ONE VOTE!
Not necessarily the worst idea but the reasons for restrictions is that you want to correlate your voters with patriots and people who uphold the ancestral values and traditions of a culture. Issue with aligning votes with just money is that a rich foreigner can come in and take over your entire government. The issue with letting everyone vote is a bunch of immigrants who don't care for your ancestral heritage can come in and take over your government.
Then to break down your reasoning for limiting voting further is that you want your most politically savvy people to have more weight than your least political savvy people. Just like with any profession like say medicine, you wouldn't take a vote of engineers to decide what to do for your illness, you would take a vote from doctors perhaps. Well, in politics people aren't equal in their opinion and this is one of the biggest issues with universal suffrage democracy is it gives those within the democracy the false idea that everyone's opinion on politics is in fact equal, it's not.
Obviously you can't know who your actual patriots and actual savvy politicians are but you can pick qualities that often correlate. Money alone isn't good enough. Treating everyone equally isn't good enough. Better to try other angles such as what I've suggested.
The purpose of a government shouldn't be to give everyone an equal say. The purpose is to govern society in the best way possible. In theory, a benevolent dictator can govern better than a democracy. There's nothing about everyone voting that inherently has value, thus restricting voting is not a bad thing at all if by doing so you get a better outcome for your government and society.
I agree all should come to Texas we shall rise again and take back our country by force!
Texas as a whole voted about 47% communist (Democrat, Green, Socialist, etc) in this election! That's a lot of "Palestinians"...
Best to start with a sparsely populated county that's already >80% Republican and have all the top activists move there, bringing it up to >95%. The top activists are the ones that make the difference - everyone else will sit on the sidelines until secession becomes easy. After just one little county sets the precedent, the dam will break!
Good point
Good thing we are a Republic, not a democracy.
Brainwashed Demonrats will never understand that.
SECESSION IS THE ONLY THING STILL WORTH TALKING ABOUT!
For starters we need political migration to a single small state / county, ideally not landlocked. Buy up all the land, vote out all the commies, and do Gandhi-style non-violent resistance - an ORGANIZED refusal to pay Federal taxes, open Civil Disobedience (like the Boston Tea Party), Internet outreach, etc...
Communist upset some people will secede and not be forced to lick Beijing Biden's anus...