866
I'd still like to hear a Democrat give an explanation for why Pennsylvania (and other states) can make up rules that specifically violate the constitution and have those votes count.
posted ago by duckduck ago by duckduck +866 / -0

What is their argument? "It already happened" isn't an explanation. I know "covid" was their excuse for changing the rules, but what is their explanation for keeping those changes and letting them stand?

51 comments
51 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (51)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 7 ▼
– Cram 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because they view the constitution as an outdated parchment that was authored by dead slave owners and they fucking knew they could defy it at every turn and nobody was going to stand in the way... And it worked! The ends literally justified the means and history will be written by the "winners"

permalink save report block reply