Obviously. But my question is did they do it in such a way that now allows for a new supreme court challenge?
I am not aware of any constitutional power that grants senate parliamentarians any legal authority to dictate the constitutional authority of the senate leader for making determinations that affect state election law.
They did what they wanted to support the leftist takeover.
Obviously. But my question is did they do it in such a way that now allows for a new supreme court challenge?
I am not aware of any constitutional power that grants senate parliamentarians any legal authority to dictate the constitutional authority of the senate leader for making determinations that affect state election law.
Good point