It's not treason when the government is not fulfilling their duty to serve the people. I guess by your standard all of the Founding Fathers were traitors.
You would have a hard time arresting people that say they want to take over the government over a drink at a bar, on a message board or some social media site.
If that were the case, many people would have been arrested when BLM, Antifa and groups like that took to the street, burnt things down, attacked police and citizens with no resulting prosecutions.
Having followed RCA (Rose City Antifa) up here in the PNW on its various social media platforms you would see plenty of the crimes over the years you seems to find abhorrent here on TDW. Having watched up close the what happened on Capital Hill here in Washington State and the crazy take over the streets in Portland, please do not lecture me on your double standard.
BLM chants "Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon" and I don't see anyone have a problem with this or these types of these mostly peaceful comments.
ISIS is still on Facebook and Twitter as well as their supporters that represent a real and clear threat.
The only difference is the Left can have these sites on Facebook and Twitter. The left is allowed on all social media to talk about killing the President, Republicans and Conservatives without any of the talk you mention above.
You are right in theory, but that day ended when the laws were only enforced supporting one political view they lose meaning.
in their defense, aoc is smoking and with those jugs, i hv to ask if she is both the biggest and the hottest politician outhere, lookswise perhaps only 2nd to tulsi
reminds of tht scene in u dont mess with zohan
i wonder if katie was remotely hot or didnt hv a boychest, if then congress would hv gave her whoreish indiscretions a freepass
since tht uk teen got banned for sending a angry email to the whitehouse abt obama, someone should do the same using nord/proton, take the hit for us
We're bad at committing crimes? Shooooot. Could you be any more clueless? Typical leftist: asked for objective evidence, provides none and then says something tantamount to "I feel". STFU.
Oh and BTW US law codes are online via Cornell, amongst others. Do you even Google, bro?
I'm lazy and don't feel like researching it for you, as I have done for many Leftists. Why don't you use the newfound knowledge I presented to you and show me where it wasn't legal. Give me a citation from US Code, otherwise I will just conclude that you're wrong and you just "feel" their behavior should be illegal.
Aside from the damage to windows in the hall, which is arguably a petty crime not even punishable in many jurisdictions anymore because of leftist cucks. I see nothing seriously "wrong" and certainly not felonious with what they did. Anecdotally: why weren't police arresting every person on sight who set foot in there if they perceived that person was guilty of a crime?
Can you be more specific to what crime?
It's not treason when the government is not fulfilling their duty to serve the people. I guess by your standard all of the Founding Fathers were traitors.
You would have a hard time arresting people that say they want to take over the government over a drink at a bar, on a message board or some social media site.
If that were the case, many people would have been arrested when BLM, Antifa and groups like that took to the street, burnt things down, attacked police and citizens with no resulting prosecutions.
𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧
Having followed RCA (Rose City Antifa) up here in the PNW on its various social media platforms you would see plenty of the crimes over the years you seems to find abhorrent here on TDW. Having watched up close the what happened on Capital Hill here in Washington State and the crazy take over the streets in Portland, please do not lecture me on your double standard.
BLM chants "Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon" and I don't see anyone have a problem with this or these types of these mostly peaceful comments.
ISIS is still on Facebook and Twitter as well as their supporters that represent a real and clear threat.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53389657
The only difference is the Left can have these sites on Facebook and Twitter. The left is allowed on all social media to talk about killing the President, Republicans and Conservatives without any of the talk you mention above.
You are right in theory, but that day ended when the laws were only enforced supporting one political view they lose meaning.
in their defense, aoc is smoking and with those jugs, i hv to ask if she is both the biggest and the hottest politician outhere, lookswise perhaps only 2nd to tulsi
reminds of tht scene in u dont mess with zohan
i wonder if katie was remotely hot or didnt hv a boychest, if then congress would hv gave her whoreish indiscretions a freepass
since tht uk teen got banned for sending a angry email to the whitehouse abt obama, someone should do the same using nord/proton, take the hit for us
We're bad at committing crimes? Shooooot. Could you be any more clueless? Typical leftist: asked for objective evidence, provides none and then says something tantamount to "I feel". STFU.
Oh and BTW US law codes are online via Cornell, amongst others. Do you even Google, bro?
I'm lazy and don't feel like researching it for you, as I have done for many Leftists. Why don't you use the newfound knowledge I presented to you and show me where it wasn't legal. Give me a citation from US Code, otherwise I will just conclude that you're wrong and you just "feel" their behavior should be illegal.
Aside from the damage to windows in the hall, which is arguably a petty crime not even punishable in many jurisdictions anymore because of leftist cucks. I see nothing seriously "wrong" and certainly not felonious with what they did. Anecdotally: why weren't police arresting every person on sight who set foot in there if they perceived that person was guilty of a crime?