Just thought I'd check out your other responses. This is curious to me. You think "cops beat your ass for no reason" yet you replied to me 3 days ago with this revelation:
"I have a lot of cop friends and former cops that are friends"
So you have a lot of pieces of shit friends? Are you a piece of shit or are you full of shit? Which is it?
hate the sin love the sinner. YES I have a lot of piece of shit friends but the cop friends I have are decent people and they will tell you there shouldn't be a police force. The force is political and corrupt, and serious crimes are ignored and minor crimes are prosecuted and cases are fabricated. Every year about 100 cases with DNA or other evidence is investigated by non government organizations and determine that the convicted criminal were wrongfully prosecuted and found guilty. How is it a jury unanimously conclude BEYOND the shadow of a doubt that a person is guilty, only to be PROVEN innocent years later. How is it possible a jury can say You we all agreed the evidence says you did it, yet they are wrong. If we had an honest and fair police force people would not be wrongly investigated and prosecuted.
Just thought I'd check out your other responses. This is curious to me. You think "cops beat your ass for no reason" yet you replied to me 3 days ago with this revelation:
"I have a lot of cop friends and former cops that are friends"
So you have a lot of pieces of shit friends? Are you a piece of shit or are you full of shit? Which is it?
hate the sin love the sinner. YES I have a lot of piece of shit friends but the cop friends I have are decent people and they will tell you there shouldn't be a police force. The force is political and corrupt, and serious crimes are ignored and minor crimes are prosecuted and cases are fabricated. Every year about 100 cases with DNA or other evidence is investigated by non government organizations and determine that the convicted criminal were wrongfully prosecuted and found guilty. How is it a jury unanimously conclude BEYOND the shadow of a doubt that a person is guilty, only to be PROVEN innocent years later. How is it possible a jury can say You we all agreed the evidence says you did it, yet they are wrong. If we had an honest and fair police force people would not be wrongly investigated and prosecuted.