posted ago by Varx
+41 / -0
Just came to mind.. Since she was so quick to fold.
Did she purposely take the georgia case, just so that she could take back her objection? Basically taking away the option from another senator who could have signed?
Seems like it may have been on purpose so that trump could never get enough points even with objections.
Just came to mind.. Since she was so quick to fold.
Did she purposely take the georgia case, just so that she could take back her objection? Basically taking away the option from another senator who could have signed?
Seems like it may have been on purpose so that trump could never get enough points even with objections.
She was LARPfler
Yes I think so, I'm not sure of the specifics of replacing the signature but I'm assuming that is the reason why Marjorie never had signature support on her challenges.
She held the line as well as Martha McSally did (twice).
Each objection only needs one person to sign from senate and house. When one senator took the charge of doing the objection, the other senators didn't add theirs.
If a senator pulls back their objection during congress, then it's too late for another senator to sign/take charge.. So it basically nullifies the chance.
He knew exactly who she was and how she would decide to play her hand. He ran with it anyway because it was more about the expose than the immediate win. She's Kemp's buddy, of course she's gonna fold.