You take a video, it analyzes it and gives you a percentage that the video is fake. With real videos the percentage is low. With fake videos the percentage is high. The video tweet had >90% and fails the uncanny valley test to most viewers. It is deep learning technology if you are interested.
Please show me where an generative adversarial network decoder actually showed a .9 fake probability. There are open source ones all over. But I never saw a score showing it was fake
I am sorry, I had to reread your original post, because I think I read it too quickly. I think I left off the "n't" of your hasn't and that you were saying you wanted to see a confirmed deep fake video. As in, that you didn't they existed at all.
My fault completely. Sorry. I should probably eat breakfast before hopping on here first thing in the morning.
You take a video, it analyzes it and gives you a percentage that the video is fake. With real videos the percentage is low. With fake videos the percentage is high. The video tweet had >90% and fails the uncanny valley test to most viewers. It is deep learning technology if you are interested.
Please show me where an generative adversarial network decoder actually showed a .9 fake probability. There are open source ones all over. But I never saw a score showing it was fake
I am sorry, I had to reread your original post, because I think I read it too quickly. I think I left off the "n't" of your hasn't and that you were saying you wanted to see a confirmed deep fake video. As in, that you didn't they existed at all.
My fault completely. Sorry. I should probably eat breakfast before hopping on here first thing in the morning.