7652
Comments (1548)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
ClownTamer 5 points ago +5 / -0

I will say that fighting against a group that willingly disregards the rules and is at a power advantage is almost always doomed to fail. We won because they bought their own bullshit last time in 2016 and real votes got through. Now, they’ve shored all that up, or are making progress towards that end.

There is no path to victory for us in the future if we continue on as we do now. I do not condone public acts of violence, but one thing BLM and Antifa did do for the left is give them more power by sharing the monopoly on violence that the government is supposed to possess. They do that in other ways too, like you being fired if you speak up, etc.

If we had our own popular media, there were antiestablishment violence groups to match or maybe dwarf BLM and Antifa, you could be fired for supporting leftist nonsense or the establishment, and strong networks of anti establishment social ties, then flat out blew up or shut down polling places if they didn’t allow observers and used digital voting machines, we’d have a chance. The establishment made it clear they can’t be negotiated with. There is no talking things out with them.

I’ll say this again to be clear: I’m not advocating for violence. I do see there being no viable path forward without some extra legal groups that have the power to enact it though. I don’t think violence should be directed at small businesses or anything like BLM is doing. I can see people going after social media and media companies though. Wall Street. Pelosi types.

There will also be less law-following when the laws are retarded, which the coming ones will be. Like mask mandates. Simply don’t follow those laws. They can’t exactly arrest an entire city.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0