2257
posted ago by sillBag ago by sillBag +2257 / -0

By seeking to overthrow the military of the United States and it's Commander-in-Chief by blocking his access to the military and Nuclear Launch Codes.

This action puts the entire NATION in danger at a very pivotal moment in our history. Any rogue nation now could fire upon us and have some expectance that a counter-attack would not be immediate and forceful.

Shake my head.

Where is the media calling for her immediate removal from power, and to be tried for treason.

Comments (77)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
63
Nezmith 63 points ago +64 / -1

I'm not sure even the President has full control over nuclear launch codes. There are a lot of channels nuke codes go through before one is fired, I doubt the response would be slowed by any easily measured amount.

That being said, they are panicking more than ever.

64
sillBag [S] 64 points ago +64 / -0

The President of the United States has sole discretion on nuclear launch capabilities.

Regardless of who all has to take action to perform that launch. The President alone can issue the order.

Anyone trying to overthrow that is committing an act of Treason.

This is fact, but nothing will come of it.

7
DrCowboyPresident 7 points ago +8 / -1

Never heard of the Two-man rule?

10
BigIronBigIron 10 points ago +10 / -0

Uh, excuse me, I think you mean the two-person rule

The person carrying the nuclear launch codes might be transgendered, have you ever considered that bigot

4
revised2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why in the world would a mentally ill person be carrying the nuclear launch codes?

3
trumpORbust 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keyholes are sexist

7
EpstinDidntKilHimslf 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, my uncle was one of them when they had that rule, I’d imagine it’s even more secure now.. well.. wait, knowing how our Gov works they’ve probably reduced it 😂🤣😂🤣... 😅😅.. oh fuck, they probably made it worse fa shooo

4
sixfingerdildo 4 points ago +4 / -0

the code is... 1... 2... 3... 4... 5!

2
rockettails 2 points ago +2 / -0

It takes both to launch, but the decision to launch unless the President is MIA/indisposed under the 25th Amendment, is with the President alone. It's not like on SSBN's or silos where the CO and XO have to concur. And even then, Tridents can't be launched without authentication from an Emergency Action Message.

1
sillBag [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes that is only to prevent the president himself from being forced into it, like with a gun at his head.

The president's order is final, the second "man" does not have a say.

3
hloblart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure the systems are not entirely automated either.

2
doodaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're missing the point. We are in psychological full frontal warfare now. I don't even know that she did this and I want her impeached.

2
Nezmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was specifically addressing the fear that we wouldn't be able to retaliate quickly. Fearmongering does worse for us than simply telling it like it is.