posted ago by Groupthinkgroupthink ago by Groupthinkgroupthink +8 / -0

The language they used no where matched the events that unfolded prior to their statements.

Even for political theater their rhetoric was detached from reality, as if something truly terrible had happened.

Remember, the previous day, there were statements floating about about how another senator could count the votes of Pence was absent?

Was Trump meant to be blown up, and Pence 'whisked away to a secure bunker' as the VP would after the Presidents assassination, just like after JFK was killed?

Comments (4)
sorted by:
2
r_u_srs_srsly 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep.

I still believe something actual and terrible did happen, beyond 100 people wandering the halls taking selfies.

they dind't just go into hiding for 6 hours and come out oblivious.

There were all scared as hell, still are.

Drunk Nancy talking about nuclear war, Cruz talking about terrorism.

Today they suggest national security information was stolen during the 6th.

2
analysissisis 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were IEDs found. Could have been event to hit the president directly or throw things into commotion. They could have hit the president and stormed the capital for pence and pelosi. Threat could have prompted PDJT to get airborne and for trump to respond to the threat from group or nations orchestrating a kinetic attack.

1
annamaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they were going to blow up TRUMP SUPPORTERS, since that's who was expected to be in the building. Check this theory out:

https://drdannielleblumenthal.wordpress.com/2021/01/07/solved-why-did-the-president-call-for-a-rally-on-january-6-and-say-it-would-be-wild/

1
Sterling1 1 point ago +1 / -0

those "pipe bombs" looked more like prop dept fakes. To add a little sizzle to the fake narrative.