The problem with any platform is that absolute free speech isn't desirable, as he indicates himself by alluding to the vicious speakers on current platforms. Would those users be banned from joining or posting at a new platform? If so then a new would the same as the old in regards to preferred speech, not free speech. Twitter and FB are hypocritical jerks, but the free speech argument isn't going to hold up anywhere in absolute terms.
It just feels like saying "That wasn't real communism."
Social sites seem to start with good intentions, the begin removing the inevitable malicious trolls, then creep into shaping the entire site into their own echo chambers.
Total and sustained free speech on the internet? I'll believe it when I see it.
The problem with any platform is that absolute free speech isn't desirable, as he indicates himself by alluding to the vicious speakers on current platforms. Would those users be banned from joining or posting at a new platform? If so then a new would the same as the old in regards to preferred speech, not free speech. Twitter and FB are hypocritical jerks, but the free speech argument isn't going to hold up anywhere in absolute terms.
How about no one is banned? Ever?
And yes...that means he allows Pelosi on his social media app, if she so chooses to be there.
Allow everyone, and let people sort out the truth for themselves.
It just feels like saying "That wasn't real communism."
Social sites seem to start with good intentions, the begin removing the inevitable malicious trolls, then creep into shaping the entire site into their own echo chambers.
Total and sustained free speech on the internet? I'll believe it when I see it.