5636
Comments (270)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
MAGAngelo 37 points ago +37 / -0

Rassmussen confirms. He gained 6% approval since Christmas. HAHAHA

9
Scumcunt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wait... so now we trust polls?

13
NegativeRainbow 13 points ago +13 / -0

Rassmussen it one of the most neutral polls. They only answer to the data. No sugarcoating or bullshit. Just data.

5
Scumcunt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean... I actually agree with you about Rasmussen. But they didn’t have things looking so hot for GEOTUS before the election, so I could see the election results that were reported being real based on Rasmussen polls. But that counters the narrative of MASSIVE voter fraud. So... which one is real?

3
NegativeRainbow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even being neutral there's the same problem you have when dealing with computers. GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out). Because the fact that they are neutral does not mean that trash data can't be fed to them which would alter the polls. Most of the other "polls" would skew the results by "overweighing" the Dem vote (Higher D+x) and/or "Underweighting" the Rep vote (smaller R+x). To put it simply it was like (the other polls) weretrying to say that Texas was going to be massively blue (Large D+x) instead of what we know that it's (R+x aka a republican majority). And the last thing that is making the polls irrelevant is the fact that all of these polls are ONLY conducted by landline... How many homes do you know have a house phone instead of each person having their own or in addition?