This is a very insightful post. We could have focused on certain irregularities better and continued pushing them until they were resolved. Now it feels a lot like we continously for these two month shifted focus all the time to the latest and greatest story of fraud at the time. But I guess it was a lot about trying to communicate how much fraud that existed to normies, to build a greater outrage. At the beginning after the election the outrage was very little among Republicans and normies. But the MSM are allowed by law these days to commit psychological warfare against the population so I guess their manipulation was just to powerful this time. Without free speech rights to participate in the public debate we can't have an honest informed debate any longer in our societies. I think this undermines Democratic elections. If people are not allowed to communicate different ideas, how can you then vote on different ideas?