I'm not sure if the anti-Q types realize that by constantly running around screeching about Q and calling others Q-tards, when the conversation at hand never has anything to do with Q, is only lending credence to Q.
The lady doth protest too much. If nobody is talking about something and you bring it up to discredit it, it only does the opposite, because you're clearly showing you place value on it by bringing it up in unrelated topics. People will notice the erratic and abnormal reaction.
Even if you could provide evidence that this predictions were actually made in 2018, they're far too nebulous to be refutable. However if there is a central communications blackout in the next week I'll throw a little credibility your way.
But FYI down voting me isn't a good way to change mer mernd.
Actually I did my homework (on that qproofs url) and it looked less credible than the election. But if you want to link me to the best proof you have I'll certainly take a look. It would certainly be important to establish proof of time line and also be comprehensive with the evaluation. Being comprehensive is important because anyone could make tons of predictions and then cherry pick the ones that were correct. (This is why my stock portfolio makes me look like an investment genius - I sell stock I took a loss on).
Twitter mods are larpier than Qtards change my mind
https://qalerts.app/?n=953 https://qalerts.app/?q=4414
Pretty damn accurate predictions for a larp.
Keep sticking your head in the ground, maybe you'll meet Xi.
I'm not sure if the anti-Q types realize that by constantly running around screeching about Q and calling others Q-tards, when the conversation at hand never has anything to do with Q, is only lending credence to Q.
How?
The lady doth protest too much. If nobody is talking about something and you bring it up to discredit it, it only does the opposite, because you're clearly showing you place value on it by bringing it up in unrelated topics. People will notice the erratic and abnormal reaction.
Even if you could provide evidence that this predictions were actually made in 2018, they're far too nebulous to be refutable. However if there is a central communications blackout in the next week I'll throw a little credibility your way.
But FYI down voting me isn't a good way to change mer mernd.
Just what do you think you're in the middle of?
I'm calling my mom right now... Yep she's picking up.. Hmm interesting.
fuck your credibilicrumbs. do your research. stop being so gullible to pop culture talking heads.
Actually I did my homework (on that qproofs url) and it looked less credible than the election. But if you want to link me to the best proof you have I'll certainly take a look. It would certainly be important to establish proof of time line and also be comprehensive with the evaluation. Being comprehensive is important because anyone could make tons of predictions and then cherry pick the ones that were correct. (This is why my stock portfolio makes me look like an investment genius - I sell stock I took a loss on).
if it ain't broke don't fix it
They got that list by playing Lin Wood backwards.
Qtards... You're just pissed because you wanted it now now now. Just wait.