138
Comments (20)
sorted by:
12
IPFreely68 12 points ago +12 / -0

And as a public company they have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to maximize profit. Everyone on the right should buy one share and join a massive shareholder class action lawsuit for destroying the user base. You don't even have to keep the share, you can sell it right away but you will have held it at one time. Even better would be to sell some short because they are going down.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
CuckS1ayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

May be cheap soon.

1
12MoreYearz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will this work if I short the stock?

3
IPFreely68 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you short a stock you are borrowing someone else's shares to sell so technically you would never have been an owner who was affected unless you also purchased at least one share for your own account during the class period. It will probably be years before a settlement would be reached but you'd still get that sweet satisfaction and if you require instant gratification then just sell some short now. Probably should do it soon though because there might not be any left to short before long.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
IPFreely68 1 point ago +1 / -0

You make a good point. Tight stops would be wise or you could even do long dated puts which should be a slam dunk. Only play if you can afford to. Otherwise save your money for defending yourself and your family.

1
throwawayicanremembe 1 point ago +1 / -0

How would this work with mutual funds?

1
IPFreely68 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you own a mutual fund that holds Twitter shares call, write, and email that you demand they dump them or you are going to dump THEM and threaten to start a PR campaign that they are anti American. Do it a few times as different people and try to find other people to do it too.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
CuckS1ayer 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would take it a step further and make a constitutional amendment stating any incorporated companies have the same constitutional restrictions as the government. Do business as they please, but they cannot violate your rights. If you do not wish to have that responsibility, remaine a sole proprietorship or partnership.

2
2008RonPaul2012 2 points ago +2 / -0

Private in the sense that it isn't owned by the government.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
PeteJeffrey [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

...so it is a public company right? Shareholders? SEC regulations? I mean, it is publicly listed.

There is no "public company" that would be a co-op or something.

2
lefty295 2 points ago +2 / -0

They really mean it's not "nationalized" or owned by the government in any part. At least legally.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LeftyTearsWillFlow 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe it is technically a public company.

Even better, if them censoring everyone helps their stock crash, the shareholders will sue them.

The SEC may even come after them as well.

1
WeinerLapTop 1 point ago +1 / -0

The SEC. Im sure they are all over big tech. Sigh

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read the terms of service. It may take a while.

Then come back here. Now do you understand?