I'm asking because I'm scared of the lack of pushback we have now. When they ban all conservative voices we won't GET a counternarrative to a story like this. It'll be whatever they say, and that's the final word.
You read the story. I read the story. If I asked three q's:
Why was she there minding her own business?
How did she get so close to a group out protesting in public?
Why did she contradict her police statement in the copy? The good Samaritan didn't help?
This is garbage that defines propaganda. Noam Chomsky might urinate in your shoe if you admitted this crude storytelling achieved its purpose.
This isn't about whether or not I, or any one of us for that matter, would buy this shit. It's a matter of understanding whether or not we've finally lost complete control of the facts and they can then frame us for anything they want with impunity.
I say that isn't new at all. Trump, Russia; possible collusion?
Once the story writers and the scribblers and the coked up cunts that run things go into overdrive their audience will break with them or be required to intensify and redouble their intensity until they wake up with a crack pipe smelling like hot bilge.
Example I just read that George F Clooney says Trump and the whole family are consigned to the dustbin of history because of the desecration of the 'People's House'. These arguments are unsustainable, too many elements only work when you are paid to believe them. Otherwise the retarded people that believe this shit are so far gone the will blackpill themselves.
What I am saying is clever and successful propagandists don't tempt the hubris nemesis.
I'm asking because I'm scared of the lack of pushback we have now. When they ban all conservative voices we won't GET a counternarrative to a story like this. It'll be whatever they say, and that's the final word.
You read the story. I read the story. If I asked three q's: Why was she there minding her own business? How did she get so close to a group out protesting in public? Why did she contradict her police statement in the copy? The good Samaritan didn't help?
This is garbage that defines propaganda. Noam Chomsky might urinate in your shoe if you admitted this crude storytelling achieved its purpose.
This isn't about whether or not I, or any one of us for that matter, would buy this shit. It's a matter of understanding whether or not we've finally lost complete control of the facts and they can then frame us for anything they want with impunity.
I say that isn't new at all. Trump, Russia; possible collusion?
Once the story writers and the scribblers and the coked up cunts that run things go into overdrive their audience will break with them or be required to intensify and redouble their intensity until they wake up with a crack pipe smelling like hot bilge.
Example I just read that George F Clooney says Trump and the whole family are consigned to the dustbin of history because of the desecration of the 'People's House'. These arguments are unsustainable, too many elements only work when you are paid to believe them. Otherwise the retarded people that believe this shit are so far gone the will blackpill themselves.
What I am saying is clever and successful propagandists don't tempt the hubris nemesis.