Of course. There is a difference between communist censoring to gain power and hide lies, and between preventative removing of harmful opportunities.
If there was no alcohol, there wouldnt be tragedies caused by it. Prohibition didn't work out in USA, but in Europe there is no way to buy a weapon illegally and anonymously. There is difference between banning drugs/prostitution/harmful content and truth. But USA do not really care about enforcing the former, while is worryingly succesful at the latter
good point. Still I think You underestimate big media ability to subvert, people reading text labeled as editorial still can be convinced by evil
I absolutely agree, but you can't outright censor without becoming the very thing we despise. It's a double edged sword for certain.
Of course. There is a difference between communist censoring to gain power and hide lies, and between preventative removing of harmful opportunities.
If there was no alcohol, there wouldnt be tragedies caused by it. Prohibition didn't work out in USA, but in Europe there is no way to buy a weapon illegally and anonymously. There is difference between banning drugs/prostitution/harmful content and truth. But USA do not really care about enforcing the former, while is worryingly succesful at the latter