If you own stock in a politically biased company, it is time to start suing them.
Jack Dorsey has no rationale for what he is doing with twitter. If its true trump drives 50% of their page hits, and they are not a publisher, then he has actively cost investors huge sums of money by removing him.
If twitter is not a publisher, then it is not their duty to remove controversial speech. Shareholders don't care so long as they're making money.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/legal-relationship-between-shareholders-ceos-33637.html
If you own stock in a politically biased company, it is time to start suing them.
Jack Dorsey has no rationale for what he is doing with twitter. If its true trump drives 50% of their page hits, and they are not a publisher, then he has actively cost investors huge sums of money by removing him.
If twitter is not a publisher, then it is not their duty to remove controversial speech. Shareholders don't care so long as they're making money.