I tried several times to write something to disprove this, but son of a bitch, this is correct! So many government agencies and employees use Twitter that it could be considered a US Government communication service.
It's an important and widely used medium. Twitter has shown selective enforcement by not actioning other foreign leaders for violent threats the same way they heavily censored and labeled Trumps tweets.
Iranian and Israeli official accounts are known for talking shit to each other on twitter. Israels military once told iran to back off with a meme
Twitter probably violated the law earlier with just the special enforcement against Trump since the election, let alone banning him outright.
Twitter also deleted posts off the official POTUS account. Something they haven't done to other countries.
That is absolutely true. At an earlier point, Trump had tried to block certain users, and they were not allowed to be blocked because the account was designated official government communication.
I think the account they suspended was President Trump's personal Twitter account. They didn't suspend the POTUS government account (the one that has the "U.S. Government" flag on it like all of the other federal accounts). I'm not sure that counts as disrupting a U.S. government communication.
We are in a congressional declared war in afghanistan. For all intents and purposes. We are at war. We have been at war for most of our existence as a nation.
It doesn't have to be WW2 scale to be "at war". Vietnam was similar to our war in Afghanistan.
Hold up. My bad. I realize now there is a difference of delcared wars and authorization of military force.
Still. Ones gotta question if this law applies. If not. I'm sure there's other laws that make it illegal to disrupt communication of a sitting president or government official
It even explicitly says " with intent to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $20,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both"
You can't tell me that Iran, China, Russia, in fact any country with a twitter account, does not have an advantage over the President of the United States with Dorseys actions.
Just wondering what seven countries would we technically be at war with? I can only really think of China, Russia, Iran, some middle eastern nations, and maybe North Korea
Go to California and do it then.
truly the better punishment would be him being himself forever
what a creepy ratbastard
No, it wouldn't. Actually holding people accountable in accordance to the laws on record is whats apprioprite.
The fuck is wrong with you; "LEAVE HIM ALONE GUIZ!"
ok brennen ok relax...
Is there a guillotine in Minecraft?
why yes only in minecraft
That's too Muslim like for Jack. We don't want to remind him of his brethren. We'll hang him.
true this ... hadnt thought pof that angle
i just love being the red queen
YES i like how you think
this was my visual ...
good idea for the rest of him
I was going to cal you out until I read this part:
So, yeah. Guilty.
kek
I tried several times to write something to disprove this, but son of a bitch, this is correct! So many government agencies and employees use Twitter that it could be considered a US Government communication service.
That's the least of that fuckers worries! He's going to choose rope or bullet from GITMO!
I'm sure they'll argue section 230 as the defense.
Look I know we colluded with foreign powers to undermine the US Government, but... um... section 230? Muh private platform.
It's an important and widely used medium. Twitter has shown selective enforcement by not actioning other foreign leaders for violent threats the same way they heavily censored and labeled Trumps tweets.
Iranian and Israeli official accounts are known for talking shit to each other on twitter. Israels military once told iran to back off with a meme
Twitter probably violated the law earlier with just the special enforcement against Trump since the election, let alone banning him outright.
Twitter also deleted posts off the official POTUS account. Something they haven't done to other countries.
That is absolutely true. At an earlier point, Trump had tried to block certain users, and they were not allowed to be blocked because the account was designated official government communication.
I think the account they suspended was President Trump's personal Twitter account. They didn't suspend the POTUS government account (the one that has the "U.S. Government" flag on it like all of the other federal accounts). I'm not sure that counts as disrupting a U.S. government communication.
HE then tweeted using the @POTUS account and they removed them as well.
removed tweet and changed password to lock Trump out
Do you mean wartime as in conflict or wartime as in Congress declared war? Because we haven't been "at war" for a long time.
We are in a congressional declared war in afghanistan. For all intents and purposes. We are at war. We have been at war for most of our existence as a nation.
It doesn't have to be WW2 scale to be "at war". Vietnam was similar to our war in Afghanistan.
https://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_and_teasers/WarDeclarationsbyCongress.htm
Hold up. My bad. I realize now there is a difference of delcared wars and authorization of military force.
Still. Ones gotta question if this law applies. If not. I'm sure there's other laws that make it illegal to disrupt communication of a sitting president or government official
That's historical wars. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_of_2001
Round him up then. Firing squad this fool already. Put Zuckerberg in the same line.
I was going to cal you out until I read this part:
So, yeah. Guilty.
Off with his head!
Justice System is broken. We're a banana republic.
20 apiece?
should be death that's TREASON
can a legal expert confirm or debunk this?
I sure hope that the US government isn’t relying on Twitter for comms
Take his ass out asap......he is a CCP operative
It even explicitly says " with intent to secure an advantage to any foreign nation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $20,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both"
You can't tell me that Iran, China, Russia, in fact any country with a twitter account, does not have an advantage over the President of the United States with Dorseys actions.
peanuts
these laws should scale for inflation
Just wondering what seven countries would we technically be at war with? I can only really think of China, Russia, Iran, some middle eastern nations, and maybe North Korea
Oh, what a GREAT point!!!