They're the actual nazis by their own definition of nazi. The left will tell you nazis censored information by burning books. That should make you angry. I mean, depriving people of any knowledge is a tragedy!
But when you look into what books were being burned and why they were burning them you will start to question yourself.... Then history.... Then the current state of the world.
Leftists know that they can't beat the system of capitalism head-to-head because capitalism is clearly a much better form of government. They can't engage in a dialogue because they know they are wrong. But if they can silence everyone that disagrees with them, then they can "win" the argument.
If they own the IPs they can totally setup a DNS server themselves. The Internet is relatively easy to decentralize, the big issue is having someone to trust to do it and the biggest issue is having people do it.
You can just add a few DNS servers' IPs in your configuration of your computer or router and bam, a whole new internet
Local DNS doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. What matters is worldwide DNS authoratative servers. You can't just set up a local DNS service and expect the big DNS servers, like ARIN's and ISP's DNS to point to you for record lookups. So in the end service providers and Internet registries control DNS, and the huge service providers provide the routing. So if government wants a domain like gab.com shutdown they can get it done through federal demands for "security reasons" or "known malicious attackers coming from this domain". Then the domain owner would have to take it to court, and we all know how fair the justice system is.
any DNS server would either be a large corporate level DNS server, or redundant and regionalized DNS server farm with VIPs and massive amounts of redundancy and scalability. This is not something your average Joe can do, unless they want to start a DNS company. Even then the DNS database will be pulled from other popularly known internet DNS servers. If you plan on using some Joe Blow DNS server be prepared for reoccuring internet issues.
You don’t really need that much, you setup secondary DNS that will resolve a madeup domain only, like .trump or .fuckccp, which your computer will query after the main DNS companies have been queried. And if that’s still too hard you can just set a particular entry on the hosts file in either windows, mac or linux
yeah, but you are talking at the individual level. Not at the DNS domain controller level. Like at a level where 100million people could point to for DNS records controlled by conservative trustworthy admin, in case of some sort of DNS shenanigans by big tech to shutdown conservative websites.
Build them a super simple Raspberry Pi loaded with Pi Hole. You can deploy it in 5-minutes of any home network your family members use. This allows you to route their home internet through a specific DNS server. It also helps block ads.
Basically a $40 microcomputer, two clock install of Pi Hole, a Cat6 cable, edit one tiny setting on their router and you’re in business.
It's rather easy and can do an script or program to easily change it. In fact most VPNs change your DNSs. Again, the biggest issue is having someone to trust on this and convincing people to actually act on it.
I'm curious about your post. I am no internet expert which is why I ask, but why couldn't they own their own datacenters, dns companies, and routing? What is the primary roadblock?
All you need is a rack in a based data center, I pay $150/mo for 1U in a nuclear proof bunker. The government literally couldn't even nuke it away if they wanted to censor content and I said no.
And to be fair, https is not the only available protocol, torrents are great for decentralized video, music and file sharing platforms. Various blockchains are perfect for censorship resistant transaction storage, like if you wanted to build something like twatter but free from censorship.
DNS servers can be changed if your current one starts to censor, tlds are usually nation based or controlled by non profit organizations. Just get a domain from a different tld if your current one start to censor.
Additionally, with tools like scallion, you can create vanity .onion url's. They're longer and more prone to typo's but having a known .onion address helps avoid any shutdown based on DNS registrars cancelling your entry.
Gab turns out to be pretty cool now, a lot of people joined who you got used to following on Twitter. And funny enough it works way more better than Parler atm
But first of all: The President is on Gab. Verified.
Ha haaaaaaaaa
"does anybody know who hosts Gab's servers?"
What the fuck is it with leftists and wanting to censor, deplatform and shut down everyone they disagree with.
They are the actual nazis.
They're the actual nazis by their own definition of nazi. The left will tell you nazis censored information by burning books. That should make you angry. I mean, depriving people of any knowledge is a tragedy!
But when you look into what books were being burned and why they were burning them you will start to question yourself.... Then history.... Then the current state of the world.
It's a domino effect my fren.
Leftists know that they can't beat the system of capitalism head-to-head because capitalism is clearly a much better form of government. They can't engage in a dialogue because they know they are wrong. But if they can silence everyone that disagrees with them, then they can "win" the argument.
good. i hate how these bastards always want to go after/destroy lives & businesses.
They own their own datacenters? And DNS? And routing?
They can be banned. Internet is too centralized right now. Starlink when?
If they own the IPs they can totally setup a DNS server themselves. The Internet is relatively easy to decentralize, the big issue is having someone to trust to do it and the biggest issue is having people do it.
You can just add a few DNS servers' IPs in your configuration of your computer or router and bam, a whole new internet
Local DNS doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. What matters is worldwide DNS authoratative servers. You can't just set up a local DNS service and expect the big DNS servers, like ARIN's and ISP's DNS to point to you for record lookups. So in the end service providers and Internet registries control DNS, and the huge service providers provide the routing. So if government wants a domain like gab.com shutdown they can get it done through federal demands for "security reasons" or "known malicious attackers coming from this domain". Then the domain owner would have to take it to court, and we all know how fair the justice system is.
DNS authoritative servers only matter because of your local DNS that comes baked in in your OS.
any DNS server would either be a large corporate level DNS server, or redundant and regionalized DNS server farm with VIPs and massive amounts of redundancy and scalability. This is not something your average Joe can do, unless they want to start a DNS company. Even then the DNS database will be pulled from other popularly known internet DNS servers. If you plan on using some Joe Blow DNS server be prepared for reoccuring internet issues.
You don’t really need that much, you setup secondary DNS that will resolve a madeup domain only, like .trump or .fuckccp, which your computer will query after the main DNS companies have been queried. And if that’s still too hard you can just set a particular entry on the hosts file in either windows, mac or linux
yeah, but you are talking at the individual level. Not at the DNS domain controller level. Like at a level where 100million people could point to for DNS records controlled by conservative trustworthy admin, in case of some sort of DNS shenanigans by big tech to shutdown conservative websites.
yes that’s been the point the whole time, the individual computer decides
You can run your own DNS Server similar to PiHole. No need to ask google which IP address is connected to which URL. =)
https://www.arin.net/reference/materials/abuse/#what-do-i-do-about-online-threats-to-my-person-or-my-business
look, on account that you only have 3 comments and 0 posts I'm going to disregard your anecdotal evidence.
and? fucking camping
Yeah but how many people know how to change their DNS. I know how most of my friends and family don't.
Build them a super simple Raspberry Pi loaded with Pi Hole. You can deploy it in 5-minutes of any home network your family members use. This allows you to route their home internet through a specific DNS server. It also helps block ads.
Basically a $40 microcomputer, two clock install of Pi Hole, a Cat6 cable, edit one tiny setting on their router and you’re in business.
For those that need the link https://pi-hole.net/
It's rather easy and can do an script or program to easily change it. In fact most VPNs change your DNSs. Again, the biggest issue is having someone to trust on this and convincing people to actually act on it.
I'm curious about your post. I am no internet expert which is why I ask, but why couldn't they own their own datacenters, dns companies, and routing? What is the primary roadblock?
The only roadblock is funding really.
The Gab CEO is reportedly talking to a billionaire President later today, so that may not be an issue anymore.
Starlink? What happens when tesla gets corrupted too?
Jack Dorsey does not run Twitter. He was put at the front of a dirty money freight train. Mark Zuckerberg does not run Facebook.
Do you think Elon Musk runs SpaceX and Tesla? Why do you think he has been so greatly maligned by the left?
All you need is a rack in a based data center, I pay $150/mo for 1U in a nuclear proof bunker. The government literally couldn't even nuke it away if they wanted to censor content and I said no.
And to be fair, https is not the only available protocol, torrents are great for decentralized video, music and file sharing platforms. Various blockchains are perfect for censorship resistant transaction storage, like if you wanted to build something like twatter but free from censorship.
DNS servers can be changed if your current one starts to censor, tlds are usually nation based or controlled by non profit organizations. Just get a domain from a different tld if your current one start to censor.
Additionally, with tools like scallion, you can create vanity .onion url's. They're longer and more prone to typo's but having a known .onion address helps avoid any shutdown based on DNS registrars cancelling your entry.
starlink never for me
no way musk isn't a chi-com globalist
welp looks like im making a gab account lol
Gab turns out to be pretty cool now, a lot of people joined who you got used to following on Twitter. And funny enough it works way more better than Parler atm
But first of all: The President is on Gab. Verified.
The link is dead in the tweet
the commie coward deleted it
just another nobody thinking they're hot shit
They are undergoing maintenance at the moment
you ain't supposed to follow any twitter link anymore anyway :)
I like Gab. More so now.
What did he say?
a dude asked who owned/hosted the Gab servers
Haha nice
Banhammer in 3...2...1...
In response to what? The original tweet has been removed
Ah, they asked who owned/hosted Gab servers XDDD
LOL! Dude deleted his tweet.
They proud to be communists though
who? The are the only one atm with all Trump's messages still on
Oh i mean the left whoops
the dipshit inquiring about who owns Gab's servers.
Nice.
need to get those servers OCONUS stat. too bad theres no free countries left
This is exactly how netwrks operates!
https://netwrks.io/beta
For context: That was a response to an account named Left-Hand Side asking who host’s Gab’s server services.
Screenshot? twatter already censored it
Go gab!!
Use nitter.net when you’re linking to Twitter.