1485
"tWiTTeR iS a pRiVaTe cOmPaNy AnD cAn dO wHaTeVeR iT wAnTs!!!1!!!!!!" (media.patriots.win)          REEEEEEE!        
posted ago by muy_libre +1485 / -0
Comments (69)
sorted by:
32
PaulieM91 32 points ago +33 / -1

We need to all agree when your private company relies on speech and you can silence any speech. you can't do "anything you want" anymore.

19
NotAnotherNPC 19 points ago +20 / -1

Their sites will become echo chambers and nothing more.

13
muy_libre [S] 13 points ago +14 / -1

What's unfortunate is ALL social media sites will become echo chambers due to censorship. People will form sites where they only communicate amongst people they agree with. The political bifurcation will accelerate.

6
Tcrlaf1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Any internet site that allows free and uncensored speech eventually becomes a conservative bastion. It’s almost like liberal ideas cannot prevail without censorship and totalitarianism.

3
HanginChad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not "almost"

2
RonaldMcDonald 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not necessarily. Decentralizing is critical to achieving more open discussion. https://infogalactic.com/info/Fediverse

4
muy_libre [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

Maybe not, but I don't see it playing out that way. Yes, alt-media will be true free speech, but the lefties will stay on Facebook, Twitter, etc., and the right-wingers will flock to the free speech sites. It will be "open" discussion among people who don't differ significantly politically.

1
RonaldMcDonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having monitored the Fediverse for 5 years, there was some of that at the beginning with respect to nodes refusing to federate with others, but it's becoming more diversified in thought as more independent instances pop up. You may be surprised what you find.

1
Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good

11
Tejas_Pepe 11 points ago +12 / -1

Twitter is now r/politics

2
Hangmhigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twits has always been a cesspool, happy to say that I have never had an account. Always wandered why Trump and others didn't try to migrate away while they had the time.

1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of us have YT channels that we use twitter for. Completely apolitical so I never had an issue for the channel. And like their policies or not, it's a way to get exposure. Hoping Gab is able to spin up advertising support for content creators.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

^^^^ Bye commie

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
NotAnotherNPC 0 points ago +0 / -0

Who let this Commie (commieratsoup) onto td.win?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ain't shit to be afraid of. I'll just take your hot pockets and tell mommy to come scoop you up in that hoopty shit brown station wagon.

5
EyesInTheHills 5 points ago +5 / -0

When they decided money was speech, they decided our voices weren't. Even with all of the obvious connections between the tech oligarchs and our own government, people will continue to say that their right to censor us is greater than our collective right to be heard.

Imagine if telephone companies were still allowed to do this! They were once and it was stopped...

2
PaulieM91 2 points ago +2 / -0

interdasting fren, never thought about the telecompanies. We might be witnessing multiple cycles meeting at once

17
r_u_srs_srsly 17 points ago +18 / -1

sure, now you've chosen to selectively enforce via an editorial board.

You're a publisher now

10
50blessings 10 points ago +10 / -0

Leftards: Silence is violence!

Also leftards: Deplatform everyone!

Soon, leftards: Why isn’t anyone talking about XYZ?!??

9
TehAgent 9 points ago +9 / -0

What happened to bake the cake?

8
Mad_Hattie 8 points ago +9 / -1

Do they still say that?

6
Dreadnot 6 points ago +7 / -1

I think it's paid shills, but yes.

2
fingis_dartan 2 points ago +3 / -1

I literally JUST got done schooling a LOLbertarian on cuckbook because he said exactly this. After a long chain of owning him, he hits me with the ad hominims and "well those are YOUR facts" These people are fucking lost...

6
Mad_Hattie 6 points ago +6 / -0

They have no idea what libertarian even means.

And the real ones have to put up with being lumped in with basically liberals who are stupid as hell.

-5
fingis_dartan -5 points ago +0 / -5

modern libertarians are just republicans who are too cowardly to admit it to their democrat friends. They make us all weak.

4
Mad_Hattie 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have democrat friends?

Since when?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
jdtiger 7 points ago +7 / -0

I saw somebody say "Twitter is a private business and Trump was a business liability". My God these people are retarded.

5
SDsc0rch 5 points ago +6 / -1

radio stations are private companies - they can't say and do whatever they want

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
pisceswolf96 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now bake the cake, bigot. /s

3
I_Love_45-70_Gov 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's in my pants is private and can do whatever....

My body, my choice.....

Epiphany! This stupid narrative shit is so damn easy.

TIL -- Communism is for fucking idiots.

3
Lolainez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Until the Biden administration passes legislation which will make certain hate speech and "violent/harassing" speech illegal, which will then force the private company to do whatever the government wants.

But, if the left hasn't discovered irony yet, it won't figure it out then either.

3
turdinthepunch 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I can legally suppress free speech as a corporation" is just as, if not more, offensive than any 1A argument (that no one is really trying to make).

3
Dreadnot 3 points ago +4 / -1

They are an arm of the CCP!

3
Hanging_Chad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Publicly-traded

1
Hanging_Chad 1 point ago +1 / -0

P.S. SELL TWTR

3
NoMoreMao 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not a private company. It’s a publicly traded company.

1
JonathanE 1 point ago +1 / -0

unless a public body owns the majority of shares, it's privately owned.

4
NoMoreMao 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it was privately owned they wouldn’t have to publicly show their books.

3
JonathanE 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a publicy traded company, but the shares are owned by private individuals or other companies/hedge funds.

Being publicly traded does not mean it is a public company (which generally means it is owned by the taxpayer).

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only in the strictest sense like a utility company.

Strictly private companies don’t have to disclose their books to the public.

1
JonathanE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perhaps this is a US/UK terminology misunderstand :)

3
TwitterIsTrash 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, it can ban random users all it wants. It can’t ban world leaders. That is an act of treason against the government.

2
Tejas_Pepe 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just because you CAN do something, doesn't mean it's a good idea to do it.

2
chipitin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It can’t it’s a platform.

2
SpezLovesHisBull 2 points ago +2 / -0

Monopoly. Bust it up.

2
change_bidens_diaper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that they can set their terms of service wherever they want. And people can go on other platforms if they don't like twitter. But denying access to elected servants of the people is a fucking stupid rule to enforce.

Twitter just fucked up. Network effect and first mover advantage doesn't necessarily last forever. See myspace or AOL. Twitter will lose half it's market cap over this, at least.

2
FattyWatt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eyes Wide Shut.

2
CurtisBlacklabel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kind of like a publisher? Choosing what to print or not to print?

2
Wankerton 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bernie bro's who stayed with the Democrats after he got snubbed are the dumbest.

2
wolfsettler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have one friend who's name is Bernie, and I call him Bertie because he hates bernie and is ashamed of having the same name as him. Must be how people named Adolf felt about that OTHER socialist that ruined that name for them.

2
RyanUpCreek 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's stock can now go plummet.

2
McGyver357 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine your phone company telling you who you can call and what you can talk about, or your email provider telling you the same. Imagine your local newspaper telling you what you can put in your advertising for your small business. They don't because they have Sec230 protection against anything you might say. Twitter and others have this same protection but tell you exactly what you can say.

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess no more bakeries need to worry about making cakes for gay weddings!

2
wolfsettler 2 points ago +2 / -0

It IS a private company. As capitalists we can't forget that. Something else we can't forget is that if they say they are an open platform for people to share their ideas then they are exempt from being sued for the messages of their users. Unless they decide what messages are allowed on their platform, then they CAN be sued.

So I suggest if YOU or anyone you know has been hurt by Antifa or BLM in any way, sue them. Sue them for allowing these terrorists to be on there and for agreeing with their messages of 'No justice, no peace.'

2
meme_oil 2 points ago +4 / -2

americans do not give up their right to speak freely just because they visit a site that is run by cucktopians! maybe the solution is to ban twitter!

1
Coeus314 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can private citizens burn it down? Seem the news only has issues with the capital building.

1
C_Taylor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bake that cake!

1
Minarchist_Manlet 1 point ago +2 / -1

Corporations shouldnt be treated like they have rights. Big Media and Big Tech need to be broken up.

1
unique_string 1 point ago +2 / -1

The internet was initially constructed as a way for distant and remotely located early warning missile defense RaDAR sites to communicate more efficiently than by telephone. Until the internet was created the operators at the RaDAR sites were calling each other up on the phone and saying to the next guy "hey i got a blip on my screen heading your way" and then the next guy would call the next next guy & tell him "that other guy says I'm getting a blip soon, you're next" and so on, down the chain, it was a very slow communications process & the creation of an electronic network to send the blips directly downstream & out every other RaDAR operator & to headquarters almost instantaneously was a massive improvement in late 1960s defense technology.

The point of all this is that Twitter is as much a private company as an airline that doesn't contribute a penny to building airports or providing air traffic control. When Obama made his "you didn't build that" speech, he was talking about companies like Twitter as well as United Airlines. Uber makes money on both the free roads and the free communications network. Uber is one of that nation's worst polluters also, but they escape responsibility for that too, while no doubt saying some gretchen thunderburp bullshit out to of their other face.

1
rusty_spittoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like that the commies went from communist to anarchic capitalists.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
HenkZeilstra 0 points ago +1 / -1

So is Parler, so Apple and Google better back the fuck up