I'm personally still on it because I'm curious to see how far they are going to take this. I don't post, I don't comment, I don't do anything but follow certain people and heart their stuff. But I do have a maga cover photo. Are they going to take me out, too?
To cause trouble. To keep an eye on things. To be in a place that they don't want you to be but there you are, at the fucking proverbial Lunch Counter, pissing them off to no end.
Because you have to stand up in every tyrants face and mock, antagonize and belittle them endlessly so that we can all remember that tyrants are just people too and ultinately hold no power that we dont give to them
After the 2016 election, investigations revealed that millions of "followers" were attributed to sweatshops in India and China that were paying people to do exactly that. But they are DEFINITELY capable of simply fudging numbers; look what they did with the vote count.
I've been thinking a lot about alternative content sharing platforms and the problems they face for the past few years and also wrote my CS diploma thesis somewhat related to this (not saying college matters, I regret wasting my time in college). One of the biggest issues new platforms face is the network effect: established mainstream platforms have a huge advantage because of the amount of content that their large amount of users produce (this includes comments). The vast amount of content further incentivises people to use an established platform, rather than joining a new one.
To hurt big tech the most I think we need a new kind of "meta platforms". Take video sharing for example: a "meta platform" for video sharing would fetch content from YouTube, BitChute, Odysee, Rumble and other existing platforms and store the metadata on its servers. It would implement its own search and recommendation (discovery) engine. This solves the challenge every new alternative platform faces: lack of (diverse) content. It would also implement common features such a subscriptions, blocking/muting users, ...
It would also allow registered users to add multiple existing video sharing platforms via OAuth (crucially YouTube) and when they would upload a video it would post it to all the different platforms the user has added to their account. On this "meta" platform the same video on multiple platforms would be seen as one video (deduplicated), with comments/likes from multiple platforms merged together. This means the content (including comments) posted on this meta platform would also be seen directly on YouTube by people who never heard of this platform. I think this feature would also attract content creators, since uploading to multiple platforms increases their reach.
I would focus on the following meta platforms the most:
Video (bridges to YouTube, Rumble, Odysee (LBRY network), BitChute, ... even Instagram videos)
Communities/news aggregator (bridges to TheDonald, Reddit, Aether, notabug.io, ...)
Microblogging (bridges to Twitter, Parler, Gab, Matrix, ...)
Platforms of this type would need a lot of compute (scraping all content from other platforms, indexing, recommendations). Storage requirements could be reduced by only storing the metadata and textual data, while embedding the videos directly from YouTube.
I think platforms of this type would face a lot of legal challenges, since the most effective way to build it would be to scrape the publicly available data from YouTube /Twitter/FB (since fetching the content via an API can be easily disabled by BIG tech). Most of the legal challenges are the result of years of lobbying by BIG tech - they are only legal, not moral challenges, since the content on those platforms is in principle made and owned by its users, not the platform itself. Making the project open source and allowing anyone to host an instance is one way I see to make it more resilient and hard to shut down, even in the face of legal pressures.
What has Pompeo don't about voter fraud? NOTHING. He is a useless idiot. All talk. No action. Just theatrics. Fuck Mike Pompeo. I wouldn't be surprised if he was in on the steal. He's just pretending to be on our side while nothing. That fat fuck.
Who the fuck cares anymore about a follower count?
Get off of twitter and ignore it.
Its irrelevant to our cause and people crying about censorship and free speech on a privately owned company are part of the problem. You never had it to begin with
I don't think he cares about his followers. He's showing what twitter is blatantly doing. Believe it or not, people on there don't know what's happening to ALL conservative accounts. They think it's just about the president being banned. Might wake up a few people to realize this purge goes way beyond just the president.
Or it might not, who knows. Can't hurt to still try.
Twitter responded to the drops saying that they "routinely do bot checks" and the drop in followers is due to accounts not responding to these. Yeah, right.
90% of congress voted to install an illegitimate president. Congress is an even bigger echo chamber than Twitter.
Nah, we're not allowed to know the names of the deep state. Could compromise government military assets and all that...
Wet 1- ply toilet paper has a higher approval rating than congress.
Used toilet paper has a higher approval rating!
Congress is being ruled by the oligarchs.
Streisand effect, there are now more looking into and for the Truth
https://www.patriotparty.gg/
I created an aggregator of thought leaders and other informative resources at patriot party.gg
Already have had to update a lot of the links with Twitter going full commie on us.
Don't Give Up You Pansies. Share with your Frens!
Going to add more, please feel free to tell me more sources, people and pages to add! God Bless You All!
I'm personally still on it because I'm curious to see how far they are going to take this. I don't post, I don't comment, I don't do anything but follow certain people and heart their stuff. But I do have a maga cover photo. Are they going to take me out, too?
I follow a few people just to know what's coming. Some people will dig into these bills that include $2000 checks and I want to know what the pork is.
He needs to switch already!!
To cause trouble. To keep an eye on things. To be in a place that they don't want you to be but there you are, at the fucking proverbial Lunch Counter, pissing them off to no end.
Because you have to stand up in every tyrants face and mock, antagonize and belittle them endlessly so that we can all remember that tyrants are just people too and ultinately hold no power that we dont give to them
Amen
Awoman
Looks like Twitter installed the Dominion plugin.
lmao exactly
lol...even kamala is gaining followers faster
Artificially.
How are they doing that? Creating fake accounts that are automatically following them or are they subscribing people without their knowledge?
After the 2016 election, investigations revealed that millions of "followers" were attributed to sweatshops in India and China that were paying people to do exactly that. But they are DEFINITELY capable of simply fudging numbers; look what they did with the vote count.
All TRAITORS deserve to hang!!!
I've been thinking a lot about alternative content sharing platforms and the problems they face for the past few years and also wrote my CS diploma thesis somewhat related to this (not saying college matters, I regret wasting my time in college). One of the biggest issues new platforms face is the network effect: established mainstream platforms have a huge advantage because of the amount of content that their large amount of users produce (this includes comments). The vast amount of content further incentivises people to use an established platform, rather than joining a new one.
To hurt big tech the most I think we need a new kind of "meta platforms". Take video sharing for example: a "meta platform" for video sharing would fetch content from YouTube, BitChute, Odysee, Rumble and other existing platforms and store the metadata on its servers. It would implement its own search and recommendation (discovery) engine. This solves the challenge every new alternative platform faces: lack of (diverse) content. It would also implement common features such a subscriptions, blocking/muting users, ...
It would also allow registered users to add multiple existing video sharing platforms via OAuth (crucially YouTube) and when they would upload a video it would post it to all the different platforms the user has added to their account. On this "meta" platform the same video on multiple platforms would be seen as one video (deduplicated), with comments/likes from multiple platforms merged together. This means the content (including comments) posted on this meta platform would also be seen directly on YouTube by people who never heard of this platform. I think this feature would also attract content creators, since uploading to multiple platforms increases their reach.
I would focus on the following meta platforms the most:
Platforms of this type would need a lot of compute (scraping all content from other platforms, indexing, recommendations). Storage requirements could be reduced by only storing the metadata and textual data, while embedding the videos directly from YouTube.
I think platforms of this type would face a lot of legal challenges, since the most effective way to build it would be to scrape the publicly available data from YouTube /Twitter/FB (since fetching the content via an API can be easily disabled by BIG tech). Most of the legal challenges are the result of years of lobbying by BIG tech - they are only legal, not moral challenges, since the content on those platforms is in principle made and owned by its users, not the platform itself. Making the project open source and allowing anyone to host an instance is one way I see to make it more resilient and hard to shut down, even in the face of legal pressures.
I can't leave Twitter because they suspended me like 6 months ago and it won't let me delete my account. Oh well.
Glad I got out on my terms. Downloaded my data and deactivated. 5.5 gigs worth of stuff I have yet to rummage through. LOL!
Yeah, it is.
EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT.
and gas chambers as well
Hey just like the election
Well the good thing about that is they'll soon only have themselves to be nasty to. Let them fight each other.
this is how you create an american ccp
The conservative numbers are going down because everyone that follows them is deactivating and deleting and getting the fuck off Twitter
That, too!
Damn, Commies redistribute everything.
Anybody know why Pompeo hasn't been blocked from Twitter yet?
Imperial March theme intensifies.....
Who cares? I pick my friends carefully. Why wouldn't I want to do it on the internet to? That's why I'm here and not on femininecommunist.soy
What has Pompeo don't about voter fraud? NOTHING. He is a useless idiot. All talk. No action. Just theatrics. Fuck Mike Pompeo. I wouldn't be surprised if he was in on the steal. He's just pretending to be on our side while nothing. That fat fuck.
SO STOP IT THEN OR SHUT THE FUCK UP! YOU GUYS HAVE THE WHITE HOUSE AND YOU SAT ON YOUR HANDS!!!
Who the fuck cares anymore about a follower count?
Get off of twitter and ignore it.
Its irrelevant to our cause and people crying about censorship and free speech on a privately owned company are part of the problem. You never had it to begin with
I don't think he cares about his followers. He's showing what twitter is blatantly doing. Believe it or not, people on there don't know what's happening to ALL conservative accounts. They think it's just about the president being banned. Might wake up a few people to realize this purge goes way beyond just the president.
Or it might not, who knows. Can't hurt to still try.
The follower drops probably reflect the purge numbers, whether forced or voluntary.
Twitter responded to the drops saying that they "routinely do bot checks" and the drop in followers is due to accounts not responding to these. Yeah, right.
Riiiiggghhhtt. No bots on KamalToe!!
BASED MIKE