39
posted ago by RemoteBus ago by RemoteBus +41 / -2

I still cant get over Trump's recent 3 minute speech at the WH where he said he would seek to provide a smooth transition to the new admin, it was as if it wasnt him, because the real Trump would never say that.

Was he just saying that to provide calm after what happened at the state building?

I swear if he goes out without even a bang, and doing some major things such as having people arrested, declassifying everything, im going to be annoyed, angry.

I want to see some fight from Trump, dont go out quietly i say.

Comments (33)
sorted by:
7
TwistedSister 7 points ago +8 / -1

Where's your fight? Or are you needing somebody else to do your fighting for you?

1
julianReyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, you could be joining Parler and urging his family members to contact the Don stat with your pleas of martial resolution.

It does not have to be violent. We simply want the perpetrators in custody to face military tribunals. We need to take action or we are culpable for the CCP moving in on the Republic of China.

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're lying to yourself. The moment the SecDef bypassed Trump and went to Pence to call out the National Guard is the moment Trump lost all control of the military.

3
redpillrising 3 points ago +3 / -0

thats technically a military coup

1
TwistedSister 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's exactly what it was.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
RemoteBus [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

what are you talking about, have a listen to Trump's 3 minute speech in the WH, he's the one that said he'd provide a smooth transition to the next admin.

2
TwistedSister 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to see some fight from Trump, dont go out quietly i say.

I'll repost the question since you're confused about what you said.

Where's your fight? Or are you needing somebody else to do your fighting for you? If you don't want it to be quiet, then go out and make some noise. What's holding you back?

4
Bigdickenergy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dude he has fought, he has fought hard for us. He has been working around the clock for the past 5 years. I have no clue when the guy sleeps. He gave up a lot in his life to make America great again.

Don't worry, Orange Man Rad isn't done draining the swamp yet. I bet you his next focus is ousting RINOs in the primaries.

4
Ryoten 4 points ago +5 / -1

No. He did all he could in 4 years against a tyrannical government that opposed him ever step of the way. Wasnt his fault.

3
Captainlizard 3 points ago +4 / -1

He did fight. He was never going to go past legal avenues. He was never going to call out millions of you to go and kill/arrest democrats. He never had the support of the military to declare martial law and overturn the fraud. There were never sealed indictments and he never had a loyal DoJ. There was no plan save for legal challenges to the fraud. He fought the fraud and the swamp but in the end you can't hold control when you have no people around you who are loyal and no one in other institutions who are courageous enough to fight with you.

2
RemoteBus [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

but is that Trump's fault then, as he is the one that chose the people around him. he chose Barr, who like so many others ended up criticizing him.

1
Captainlizard 1 point ago +2 / -1

Partially yeah, he chose people that were likely submitted as candidates. However he had no experience in politics and had to rely on people that did to get recommendations. I'm sure he had Rudy as a top pick but was told he would never be confirmed. The farther out you go in postings the less he likely knew about the candidates. He trusted very few people to begin with and there was never much chance that they would be put in any roles as department heads unless they had spotless records and support among the senate swamp.

3
1q2s3e4f5t6h7u8k9o0 3 points ago +4 / -1

Absolutely. To yield a presidency to a fraudulently elected president is considered treason. Everyone who is in a position such as his took an oath to defend the US constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic. To fold when the going gets tough is the ultimate sign of weakness and cowardice.

3
losty 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd be sad. I believe he's done a lot in the background and is further doing it. I wouldn't blame him if he feels he can't do it in public. I'd just be sad.

And probably a bit scared, because that means that things are worse than we can see.

2
ShampocalypseWOW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not at all. I certainly wouldn't blame him for not wanting to subject himself or his family to what the fascists keep doing to him.

Of course, that would be stupid, because there's no way they will let him go quietly. They will seek revenge endlessly. So he might as well fight to the death.

2
noTimeLikeToday 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm starting to think the same thing... I expected to see something by now

1
LiberatedDeathStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't, I expected to see something between the 6th and 20th. Looked like the most optimal time to me.

2
BenLurking 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep the faith but make preparations

2
Changed777 2 points ago +2 / -0

NO I WILL NOT FEEL BETRAYED. HE HAS DONE MORE THAN HE HAS TO. BTW SEARCH AND READ THE POST FROM TODAY.. THE NYE NEVADA GOP CHAIRMAN LETTER. THANK GOD FOR HIS MERCY ON US IN THE PERSON OF DONALD TRUMP. NOW LET'S GOOOOOOO!!

1
HueyLongAdmirer 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's important the message is relayed to him that he NEEDS TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW and/or REX 84 ASAP!!!

1
julianReyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

The NYT article surprisingly claims that he regrets that moment of weakness and that he is "not going to resign."

We should pressure him to invoke IA or Directive 51 instead of assuming he already knows about it. Bryne revealed to us that there have been a lot of "advisors" (read: malicious chancellors) who have been poison-pilling him with misinformation about his presidential capabilities.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MrAjParker 1 point ago +1 / -0

"without a fight"

umm what? He's been fighting non-stop for years, dude.

1
RemoteBus [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

by that i was referring to him leaving quietly, and not using his powers to arrest people for sedition.

I believe Lincoln had people arrested for sedition.

1
AngelMark 1 point ago +1 / -0

New admin means new govt! Once he drains the SWAMP the gov will finally be FOR THE PEOPLE! THAT is what he means by smooth transition. You think he is gonna let kiddie fucking money laundering treasonous SATANIC SWAMP CREATURES take over the country after all he has accomplished? You obviously haven't been paying attention! Have faith!

1
Phins360_FL 1 point ago +2 / -1

yes

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-3
CORPORAL -3 points ago +2 / -5

No. If you disagree with trump then you are a traitor and should be arrested.

0
GunTottinPatriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

What?? if Trump chose not to use the military the insurrection act or martial law which was totally under his authority than not only I disagree with him I will always remember he was afraid to do what was necessary to save the country just because he was afraid of some fake media calling him mean words

The question is did he want to do it but couldn’t get the support for it or was he against the military option from the get go?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3