INTRO

Some will scream "LARP", but I'm not claiming to have a crystal ball into the outcome other than my gut telling me theres still more to come to fruition in the coming days/weeks -- Im sure itll be a mixed bag of political mudslinging on opponents but moreso some outside the box concepts that may be lawful and/or shock folks (and probably from both parties).

WHAT GENERAL PUBLIC KNOWS

One lesser known truth that I havent seen many talk to on TDW is the existence of more than one US Constitution (yes, you read that correctly). The one publicized that we the public refer to is the one following the D.O.I. when we became a country. During that time, it was known as "The Constitution FOR The United States of America". This is what we perceive our elected reps are fighting to defend.

ACT OF 1871

Where it changed - Following the Civil War, US was depleted of financial resources and signed the Act of 1871 and changed ONE word making us a corporation "The Constitution OF The United States of America". It was signed to make the US incorporated, incurring a debt with international banks and creating a Government of District of Columbia (DC). Through this new document (yes new, because the title was changed) operates economically and can be misleading in that its used to govern the Republic for its people; Id argue that theres some gray here. This is why I contemplate why our elected officials choose when to, and not to, take a stand on apparent "constitutional" matters the public has a strong opinion on. Things that people even perceive as rights like traveling are more or less privileges (why you have to have a license).

**Act of 1871 Source(s): http://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/

https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/two-us-constitutions

INAUGURATION DAY WAS IN MARCH

Founding father Presidents were inaugurated closer to Spring, mostly in March. FDR changed this in the 1930s to Jan 20th by ratifying the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution used today (post-1871). I found it interesting that Peter Navarro in early January said to Judge Jeanine on FOX that Trump could postpone that date were familair with, but did not elaborate further:

“January 20 cannot be changed; that’s constitutional,” Pirro added, “The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January … and the terms of their successors shall then begin.”

“It can be changed, actually,” Navarro said. “We can go past that date. We can go past that date if we need to. And we have got to get this right”

**Inauguration Change Source: https://www.history.com/news/why-does-inauguration-day-fall-on-january-20

**Highlights of Peter Navarros interview: https://m.theepochtimes.com/peter-navarro-says-inauguration-day-can-be-postponed_3642730.html

LASTLY

To help tie alot of the nWo theories, Id suggest watching this video below. Ive seen it wiped from YT a few times and reuploaded, so I wouldnt go sharing on a ton on platforms (cue up around 8 min in). Its the ongoing theory of a one world government, and explained in detail weaving in warnings through JFK, IKE, & Reagan speeches. Trumps decisions of creating peace in the M.E. may have delayed that plan since they have banks/oil out that way resulting in the alleged neverending pursuit (hence why were never poking Africa & Australia), but also why Venezuela is always a topic of discussion. It ties in alot, so buckle up and judge for yourself: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLs6gGYcoXRpQFhCQjp1swae7UsoYk-JoD

THOUGHTS

I see alot of IA/Military/E.O. commentary on here. While I am as curious as everyone here watching and learning exactly what executive actions remain, I'm curious if some of that plays into going back to the organic (pre-1871) Constitution FOR the US bringing credibility to Navarros ambiguous statement of the date postponing (i.e. March) along w/ GEOTUS tweet of not attending in Jan. Could there be a constitutional play regarding elections and March-date renewed if the organic document is reverted back to? Idk if theres any more outcome reversing that can be done, but its absolutely a mind bender w/ some of the confidence that some key Trump supporters have (i.e. Flynn, Wood, MyPillow Mikey), along w/ the drive from Democrats to expedite Impeachment/25th Amendment proposals. My point is, theres probably alot on the surface that we cant see (after all Trump signed a new E.O. on succession for Intl Devopment Finance on 1/8, that Ive yet to interpret in full the meaning behind, and this late in the game). Feel free to go down the rabbit hole on this (or call me out if Im misinterpreting lol) on this a neverending hole/saga.

Stay safe, be patient, and have a great weekend!