450
Comments (27)
sorted by:
83
entwickelnden 83 points ago +84 / -1

thats an incredible misleading title. dont be fake news. google talked to parlor about standards they didnt say hey guys, starting thursday we ban everyone.

32
Bonami 32 points ago +33 / -1

Thank you, well said, this is very misleading

6
QueenMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wel if this is true and if they planned to ban POTUS account a week ago, that would have been before the events at the Capitol

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I think this is all of a piece, they were stealing the election on the 6th so they would need to shut him up fast.

6
d_bokk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, what's interesting in the post though is that it sounded like Google was laying the groundwork to ban Parler and the call was just so they could send out a press release pretending to have tried to get them to comply beforehand.

2
DeadOverRed 2 points ago +2 / -0

And it's not like we haven't all been saying this was about to happen for the last year

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, came here to say this. Thank you.

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!

25
Bonami 25 points ago +25 / -0

From the post I get the impression they were only talking about what Perlor had to do, not the rest of the internet.

7
DeplorablyCorrect 7 points ago +10 / -3

So this was all a set-up.

15
pithys 15 points ago +15 / -0

the post says they only discussed what google was requesting to remove, not that any action would be enforced

-6
concealedaces [S] -6 points ago +3 / -9

Then perhaps they shouldn't claim to be a "free speech platform"? Of course they won't allow anything illegal, but they claim to be a completely free speech platform. Yet google can tell them to remove stuff? I'm on GAB now, which is where it seems the president will be soon

2
infojunkie07 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one is truly free speech my dude. Parler does have TOS. I hear they were broadcast level strict.

1
MAGAorGTF0 1 point ago +1 / -0

The screenshot you posted is only talking about what Google wanted Parler to do. Google was trying to force them to moderate the content or they would take them off the play store, which Parler obviously didn't do so Google took them down.

1
Dingdong999 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s on there now

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
2
FitOfficial 2 points ago +4 / -2

Divide and conquer. Fuck off, shill.

0
concealedaces [S] 0 points ago +5 / -5

Or at least withheld information to not bleed users. They were getting shitty with a hell of a lot of spam. Couldn't even read comments due to spam coin ads haha

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
Censorddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

That was my fucking take too!

1
JustInTime2_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Parler was warned two years ago. They tried policy of appeasement.

1
Magafactured 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post was hyperbolic, but it doesn’t negate General Flynn‘s question:

Goolag, the big dog, suddenly “don’t know how to use zoom“ when it is indicated that the meeting will be recorded? OK, that’s not suspicious in the least 🙄

  1. Google continues to do shady, back-alley shit to take out President Trump, as they have been caught on tape swearing to do, and they did it last week, as the anti-Trump shit was building to a frenzy.

  2. Parler witnessed it, and decided wait to reveal it until now.

  3. General Flynn asked “why did you wait so long?

So Flynn’s question isn’t valid?

1
entwickelnden 1 point ago +1 / -0

i didnt refer to flynn's question i specifically called out OP. And no Flynn's question still doesnt matter. reread what happened. where in that would parler think google was about to ban everyone? they didnt even have a complete conversation as google bailed on the zoom meeting and never rescheduled. theres plenty of witches to hunt but this aint one.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-1
Constitution_jd -1 points ago +2 / -3

Parler is Mercer trash, so I wouldn't be surprised