24
I'll do it again! MARSH V. ALABAMA
posted ago by NomadicKrow2 ago by NomadicKrow2 +24 / -0

MARSH .V ALABAMA. COMPANIES HAVE NO ABILITY TO RESTRICT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH.

MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA

I'll keep posting this until it gets traction.

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/326us501

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

PLEASE GAIN TRACTION.

A private company could not restrict speech, even though it owned the sidewalk the speech was being distributed. THIS APPLIES TO TECH COMPANIES.

19 comments
19 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (19)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 1 ▼
– NomadicKrow2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is abrogation. Does our legal system allow this? Because Kavanaugh's opinion flies in the face of the original ruling.

permalink save report block reply