MARSH .V ALABAMA. COMPANIES HAVE NO ABILITY TO RESTRICT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH.
MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA
I'll keep posting this until it gets traction.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/326us501
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
PLEASE GAIN TRACTION.
A private company could not restrict speech, even though it owned the sidewalk the speech was being distributed. THIS APPLIES TO TECH COMPANIES.
i completely agree with what your doing and after reading it i got excited im just not sure it applies to the internet
If it doesn't apply to the internet, then the 1A only applies to the printing press and the 2A only applies to muskets.