24
posted ago by NomadicKrow2 ago by NomadicKrow2 +24 / -0

MARSH .V ALABAMA. COMPANIES HAVE NO ABILITY TO RESTRICT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SPEECH.

MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA MARSH V. ALABAMA

I'll keep posting this until it gets traction.

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/326us501

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

PLEASE GAIN TRACTION.

A private company could not restrict speech, even though it owned the sidewalk the speech was being distributed. THIS APPLIES TO TECH COMPANIES.

Comments (19)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
FreeTheSignal 1 point ago +1 / -0

i agree thats also true republicans missed their 1 and only chance to protect free speech on the internet and they dont even seam to realize that they will be the first ones removed. well they might finally now but they are 4 years too late

1
NomadicKrow2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The T.Rex didn't see his end coming either. All those fucking teeth for nothing.

1
FreeTheSignal 1 point ago +1 / -0

haha that was a good one

1
NomadicKrow2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what I mean by their "end" coming is the Republican party will collapse in the next two years. They shit on too many patriots and nobody is going to vote for them. They disenfranchised their own voter base.

I have to clarify when I talk about "ending" something because I don't want anyone (the FBI) saying I'm talking about murdering people. Which I'm not.