So you're saying if Trump and someone posting to Q were sitting in the same room and coordinating a 0 delta, that would be impossible? They couldn't have had pre written posts and hit enter in succession?
Sorry I missed you saying that the timestamps could've been edited by an admin. But there is more proof than just the deltas. The biggest proof is that Trump never disavowed Q and has only talked positively about the movement.
It's not an attack if Q is genuinely harmful to your movement. Trump invited a guy to the WH just because he had a Q shirt on at one of his rallies. Trump definitely fanned the flames of the Q movement
Says who? Did you see it?
Or did you just look at the time stamp after the fact and trust your eyes?
So you're saying if Trump and someone posting to Q were sitting in the same room and coordinating a 0 delta, that would be impossible? They couldn't have had pre written posts and hit enter in succession?
Yes, technology isn't instantaneous.
For example, it takes about two minutes for anything I post here to show up.
Different infrastructures will have different capabilities.
How do you know how long it takes for your posts to show up on here?
Because I can't stinking edit them until a couple minutes have passed and if I reload the page I can't see them either.
Sorry I missed you saying that the timestamps could've been edited by an admin. But there is more proof than just the deltas. The biggest proof is that Trump never disavowed Q and has only talked positively about the movement.
Trump said he doesn't know anything about it, but that they were good people or something.
Why disavow something that aligns with your own goals? You don't attack allies.
Do you want to be the one to tell your kids thst Santa isn't real?
It's not an attack if Q is genuinely harmful to your movement. Trump invited a guy to the WH just because he had a Q shirt on at one of his rallies. Trump definitely fanned the flames of the Q movement
Of course he did.
I never said Q was harmful to the movement.
It's naive to believe everything Q said, but not everything Q posted was false. A lot is true. That's useful.
I do think it has been used to discredit a lot of serious topics. But that's normal for any high profile target. They did the same thing to Pizzagate.
People think I'm a Q follower because I'm always saying the same kinds of things as Q.
But I'm not, I was here before Q and learned of most of the things Q covers before Q existed.
I trust God, not "the Plan". My hope comes from the prophets.
I wished very much that Q was real, but my research made me believe that it most likely was not.
My problem with Q is that someone is toying with people. And I don't like that. Lies shouldn't be required to advance an agenda.
But I understand why Trump is reluctant to shatter the illusion.