Could this be used as evidence of an antitrust suit?
Say... McDonald's tells their food service manufacturer to stop providing cups, cartons, wrapping paper etc to in n out after suddenly a ton of people start going to in n out. That would have to be illegal.
Because Parler isn't there anymore.
Could this be used as evidence of an antitrust suit?
Say... McDonald's tells their food service manufacturer to stop providing cups, cartons, wrapping paper etc to in n out after suddenly a ton of people start going to in n out. That would have to be illegal.
But... isn't Signal there now for the exact same reason?