5160
Comments (204)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
BasedFatTails2 6 points ago +7 / -1

Open source means you can verify their security yourself. I get you too retarded to do that but many others including myself have. Also yes open source is more secure since anyone can call out bugs and test it.

I get it you’re a boomer or a retard that can’t understand the concept but sure don’t use signal if you don’t want to. Shit if your ignorance drives you to use smoke signals go ahead

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
BasedFatTails2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya good pun, on the hearbleed 0 day. That came from closed source....good job arguing against yourself. And all code will have bugs open source not only reduces those, but they will also be found faster.

Like I said go ahead and use smoke signals, or make your own app if you don’t trust anyone else’s, granted it’s gunna be shit but go ahead

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BasedFatTails2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can do that with signal too you dumbfuck. Its seems like you’ve never actually read the signal source code. Its idiotic to pretend your code even if open source will have less bugs and be more secur. The encryption Lagos are usually not the problem. Its the sorrounding code. Ironic you call signal engineers code jockeys when you seem to know nothing about software. I assume you know some python and think you a pro lol

1
BasedFatTails2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I admit I misread, and thought you meant the heartbeat intel bug.