122
posted ago by NimbleNavigator +123 / -1

Remember when he claimed to have spoken to "the real Q", which got memory holed real quick?

Now notice he's right on that glowie bandwagon blaming Q researchers for complacency.

Now he claims to have spoken to Trump, and has a working understanding of all the players and their hands.

Notice how quickly he changed gears to "revolutionary leader" mode?

Best way to destroy your opposition is to lead it yourself.

Alex is a Deep State disinfo agent, who played a role for as long as the discrediting tactic of associating people with Jones worked.

It's the same thing as FOX. Let them exist for some two party illusion fighting, let them exist for as long as you can call them Fake News.

When reality strikes, Infowars and FOX are revealed as the Deep State traitors they are.

Make sense now why he's sucking Tim Pool's dick for waning YouTube relevance?

Remember when he claimed to have spoken to "the real Q", which got memory holed real quick? Now notice he's right on that glowie bandwagon blaming Q researchers for complacency. Now he claims to have spoken to Trump, and has a working understanding of all the players and their hands. Notice how quickly he changed gears to "revolutionary leader" mode? Best way to destroy your opposition is to lead it yourself. Alex is a Deep State disinfo agent, who played a role for as long as the discrediting tactic of associating people with Jones worked. It's the same thing as FOX. Let them exist for some two party illusion fighting, let them exist for as long as you can call them Fake News. When reality strikes, Infowars and FOX are revealed as the Deep State traitors they are. Make sense now why he's sucking Tim Pool's dick for waning YouTube relevance?
Comments (51)
sorted by:
38
Thunderbolt45 38 points ago +39 / -1

Nope. He is a somewhat intelligent nut. He has enough common sense and deductive reasoning to make sense of what MIGHT be going on behind the scenes with educated guesses. He throws out his theories, comes close enough to be considered right on some of them that he gains credibility despite his insane conspiracy theories.

12
Lapstrake 12 points ago +15 / -3

He makes up shit all the time. Says he talks with Q.

When the Vegas shooting happened he made up a story on the spot about how the room was filled with Islamic Terror printed materials.

He constantly mixes accurate information with fake shit so it is a big muddled mess. He never encourages independent research.

He acts reasonable for a while and amasses more followers. Then he doesn't some asinine shit to discredit himself and everybody who follows him.

1
AmericanScholar373 1 point ago +1 / -0

This forum is filled with people who will dismiss Q as a LARP, the same position as MSM, and have zero clue that AJ is MOSSAD down to his bones. This was exposed long ago, and receipts showed that everything down to the very office he worked out of was tied to MOSSAD. Has anyone here listened to Bill Cooper's take on AJ when he seemingly emerged out of the blue? In my opinion, AJ's mission is to incite violence and lead sheep to the slaughter.

-1
hisnamewasjeff -1 points ago +3 / -4

Alex Jones lost his mind

He knows the truth. I believe he does.

Once you know the truth..you lose your mind.

If the truth is fucked up......then what is real???

He is a nutjob but there's truth to what he is saying.

He knew the truth.

And he fell down the rabbit hole.

Once you do..everything seems fake.

You lose your mind.

Many people do the same. They fall in the conspiracy theory hole and they forget what is real.

Be careful not to happen to you too.

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
6
nimblenavigator2015 6 points ago +6 / -0

Alex Jones has always been based (even before Trump), OP is either LARP or controlled opp.

-15
NimbleNavigator [S] -15 points ago +5 / -20

It's called getting ahead of the narrative.

That way, when it hits in full force like it has been, there's a guy ready made to "lead you through it"

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
AmericanScholar373 1 point ago +1 / -0

Infowars and their associates are MOSSAD backed, and it's been long known. If you don't know that by now, it might be you that's not worth arguing with.

20
BulletsForTeethORG 20 points ago +21 / -1

I knew Alex way back when we shared a studio together. He's always been a sensationalist, he's not some deep state operative trying to steal your cookies.

5
Nimblestpepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tell us more?

18
painter1 18 points ago +20 / -2

Its more likely that you are the controlled opposition

8
PedemusPrime 8 points ago +8 / -0

This.

-6
NimbleNavigator [S] -6 points ago +5 / -11

Yeah, random internet poster is more likely to be controlled opposition than a vitamin selling political commentator

4
ValeyForge 4 points ago +4 / -0

True. You being controlled opposition is overblowing it a bit; more like you're just a disinfo agent.

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely true

5
King_of_Sheba 5 points ago +6 / -1

Eh. Hard to believe.

4
1DontTreadOnMe1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes lets not forget his Y2K stunt.

1
hisnamewasjeff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha, this sounds wild, I don't think I followed Alex Jones then, what the fuck was it all about?

I think I first heard about him after 9/11 or so, I had no idea he did something like that but it sounds hilarious

0
AmericanScholar373 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thank you. It irks me every time I see INFOWARZ posted here, but it's a hill I can walk around.

4
UK_Deplorable 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree, he doesnt help the cause.. For example, I was constantly accused of, and to keep listening to AJ for my news, every time i questioned the leftists etc... even though hardly watched anything he said since the bohemian grove carry on..

4
Harambe 4 points ago +5 / -1

Not controlled opposition IMO, just jealous about losing audience to a faceless troll

3
fsvantesson 3 points ago +3 / -0

He changed when they came after his kids. I'd probably do the same, given the same situation.

Also, he was always primarily an entertainment figure who pushed things way too far because it tickled brains and was provocative.

3
tommythecomicguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alex is legit. He goes off the rails at time but shit, who doesn't know how all this shit works.

3
Madnote1984 3 points ago +5 / -2

So you're trying to convince us that Jones is a disinformation agent but an anonymous internet poster who's identity can never be confirmed should have a following akin to Jesus Christ.

No.

2
NimbleNavigator [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, where did I say Q should have a following like Jesus?

I said two facts. 1 that Jones once claimed to have spoken to "The real Q", the 2nd being that he's blaming independent researchers for complacency.

How you ever managed to get your mad ravings from my post, I'll never know.

1
Madnote1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't say that but thats about how fervent you guys are in your unyielding faith in Q. And it is FAITH, in the truest sense of the word. None of the biggest happenings ever really happened. Durham was a bust. All of that shit was just nothing. But still, people knock on your digital door wanting to tell you about the latest word from Q and asking "have you read from the book of proofs?" I followed Q for a year, im not speaking from ignorance, I just bought out when nothing of substance ever came to pass.

As far as Jones, he said he knew who the two guys were that started it in the administration and that they were told to stop it, and thats when it got hijacked by someone else.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
JustInTime2_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

AJ is a business man. Nothing else.

3
Rudyard 3 points ago +4 / -1

He could just be crazy and bad at his job. Not saying you’re certainly wrong, just offering another possibility.

3
Dyldozer 3 points ago +4 / -1

He's deep state Banned from big tech Name someone who's deep state whos banned. I'll wait

2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS.

Alex Jones is NOT our guy.

2
George 2 points ago +5 / -3

I thought it was obvious with his shitty acting.

Also that one documentary where he somehow sneaks into that super secret grove meeting or whatever.

2
bavarianpesant 2 points ago +2 / -0

or he is simply a nut

1
Rockonanon 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I think a servant of the enemy would look fairer and feel fouler."

1
AmericanScholar373 1 point ago +3 / -2

OP, this forum is filled with people who will dismiss Q as a LARP, the same position as MSM, and have zero clue that AJ is MOSSAD down to his bones. This was exposed long ago, and receipts showed that everything down to the very office he worked out of was tied to MOSSAD. Has anyone here listened to Bill Cooper's take on AJ when he seemingly emerged out of the blue? In my opinion, AJ's mission is to incite violence and lead sheep to the slaughter.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alex is a nut. He may be intelligent, and he may be entertaining to some, but at bottom, he's a nut.

1
Texas1st 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is human and is scared.

1
Aldoraine007 1 point ago +4 / -3

Ok Qfag

1
JoseffineBiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont think hes deepstate at all and I love watching alex, but absolutely no way he has been speaking with the president directly or anyone close with him. I think he just receives false information sometimes from sources that sometimes give him good information, and he loves when people think hes like an omnipotent new reporter with direct contact to the White House and the president, but it's just false

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

If Jones is deep state then why was he deplatformed?

0
AmericanScholar373 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why did the MSM attack Bush relentlessly? Because he was oUR gUy?

1
NimbleNavigator [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ding ding ding

-2
NimbleNavigator [S] -2 points ago +3 / -5

You fail to understand the term "controlled opposition"

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +2 / -1 (edited)

So the deep state deplatformed themselves?

Look, your definition of "controlled opposition" is too broad to be taken seriously. Alex Jones says a lot of outlandish shit to keep viewers interested. He interacts with people he disagrees with as a way to stay relevant. But he's not much of an opposition.

Look at the people at FOX: They act like they're there to get a paycheck. They have no enthusiasm or passion. Anchors could easily quit FOX and get a job at CNN. They stab Trump in the back during the most crucial times, like the debates or during election night. They hire people like Donna Brazile. They're engaged in real opposition.

2
nooodoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t know about AJ so I cannot say a thing about him.

But I can see a good reason for them to publicly deplatform their own guy. To legitimize it. As long as people can still reach their guy, he would still be useful to them. But again, I don’t know enough about AJ to say he is.

1
DX5_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could just as easily legitimize AJ by giving him some inside info that turned out to be true. Censoring him on all platforms but his own personal website seems like it would defeat the whole purpose.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Rayder 1 point ago +3 / -2

You posted this same crap last night. Stop spamming or at least make it interesting and don't copy paste.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
earthtrekker7 0 points ago +1 / -1

Maybe unpopular opinion here but I've always been skeptical of Alex Jones. After I heard what he said about Sandy Hook I stopped taking him seriously