If you can accept it, those who call themselves Jews today are not of the tribe of Judah, merely residents of Judea during Jesus time (who was of the tribe of Judah, along with His parents Joseph (legally) and Mary (biologically)).
These Judeans were "jewish" in religion only. Most of those living in the southern territory of Judea by the time of Christ were actual Idumean, or Edomite, or .. if you like.. Amalekites, a mixed people known in the bible collectively as Ereb or Arab (those who darken), with few remaining from the tribe of Judah, Levi, and Simeon.
Some remaining Israelites remained pure, like Zechariah (of the tribe of Levi), but most mixed, becoming groups like what we know as the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Hasmonean kings, the Herodians. For example, the Herods, who claimed the title "king of the jews", were opposed by the few remaining Israelites, because he was an Idumean, as documented by Herodotus, a product of integration of those populations following the time of the Maccabees.
Most of the other tribes had long dispersed into the surrounding nations, maintaining their tribal heritage, Judahites were living in Galilee (ex. Joseph and Mary, and the disciples, who were from the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, or the half-tribe of Manasseh, except John, who is believed to have been a Levite), and Benjamites in Tarsus (Saul for example).
As for the other tribes of Israel, who maintained their hereditary lines, they were long since deported north and across the Euphrates by the Assyrians in 722 BC becoming as they were called by the Assyrians the Beth-Omri (lit. the house of Omri, the last notable king of Israel), then they came north and were know by the Persians as the Sakae-Suni, or in greek Scythians, or in Eastern Europe the Greeks called them, Galathai (milk drinkers) and Romans shortened this to "Gauls" who also lived in Galatia in Anatolia. They retained that name in several ways as they were differentiated by Julius Caesar in his Gallic Wars as those beyond the Rhine the Germani (German) Gauli, or genuine or pure Gauls, to distinguish them from the Gauls in roman territory who lost their identity, largely. Their name for themselves varied, but the most notable come from these names, for example the Saxons (derived from their name for themselves in Persian the Sakae-Suni, literally means Isaac's sons, (I)SAXSONS).
Tribe of Dan or Danites, took the name Dane in the country of Dan's mark, Ephraim became the Angles; Manassah, after his oldest son Machir, likely became what we know as the Ha-Machiri, or American, Reuben, after a king called Frank, the franks, Some Judahites, the Jutes; Levi, perhaps the origin of the Druids; many became know as the Goths (literally God's (people)), settling Spain, Italy (the Lombards), Austria (the Ostrogoths), The Scots, who say their name comes from Scatha or Scythian)..
If you can accept it, western europe, is Israel, who, upon receiving the Gospel of Jesus Christ, have fulfilled His promises for Israel, becoming Christendom, and, as God said to Abraham, in your seed will all the families of the earth be blessed.
I mean, the cornerstone of Jewish, antichrist, ideology is that they are God’s chosen people, and the narrative that the western world is Amalek, is just backwards, they are amalek and we are Israel, can debate the exact nature of that, but that’s the argument that would shatter their narrative
Lastly, I've only lately come to this theory. Practicing Christian for 20 years, undergraduate in biblical studies, masters in theology, read Greek and Hebrew, ordained in reformed Baptist tradition, served as teaching pastor/elder for 5 years, just to give you some background that when I heard this theory i've done nothing but investigate it for the last year, and it has radically changed my understanding of the old testament, new testament, and eschatology. Just for some background.
Mostly agree. My issue with that is that it requires a “spiritual” fulfillment of the promises to Abraham Isaac Jacob David. I understand your point, and agree with the assessment of the “Jews”. I just think that what you’re advocating is replacement theology, which denies the literal fulfillment of God’s promise to Israel. If you allow that the Jews of Jesus day were not in fact of Judah, and that Israel basically populated the western world, Greece through Darda, Troy through Zerah, Rome from Troy through Anneas, the Spanish from Carthage (tribe of Asher and Dan), and the Germanic people roughly from the remnants of Israel.. you can have literal fulfillment of all the Old Testament and New Testament promises to Israel fulfilled in Christendom, and those imposters that “claim to be Jews and are not but are a synagogue of satan” makes much more sense as a cohesive systematic theology, aligning with a roughly post-millennial view of eschatology, and accounts for all the description by the apostles of what the anti christ is (too long to go into detail, but it’s the “Jews”)
Also, I almost mentioned in previous post that the Saxons are named after their knives, interesting that their knife would be called an (I)sax, Isaac’s, since the most notable aspect of Isaac’s history is his sacrifice at the hands of his fathers knife. It’s a stretch I know. However, and this is linguisticly verified, about 30% of all Porto-Germanic is of Semitic origin.
If you can accept it, those who call themselves Jews today are not of the tribe of Judah, merely residents of Judea during Jesus time (who was of the tribe of Judah, along with His parents Joseph (legally) and Mary (biologically)).
These Judeans were "jewish" in religion only. Most of those living in the southern territory of Judea by the time of Christ were actual Idumean, or Edomite, or .. if you like.. Amalekites, a mixed people known in the bible collectively as Ereb or Arab (those who darken), with few remaining from the tribe of Judah, Levi, and Simeon.
Some remaining Israelites remained pure, like Zechariah (of the tribe of Levi), but most mixed, becoming groups like what we know as the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Hasmonean kings, the Herodians. For example, the Herods, who claimed the title "king of the jews", were opposed by the few remaining Israelites, because he was an Idumean, as documented by Herodotus, a product of integration of those populations following the time of the Maccabees.
Most of the other tribes had long dispersed into the surrounding nations, maintaining their tribal heritage, Judahites were living in Galilee (ex. Joseph and Mary, and the disciples, who were from the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, or the half-tribe of Manasseh, except John, who is believed to have been a Levite), and Benjamites in Tarsus (Saul for example).
As for the other tribes of Israel, who maintained their hereditary lines, they were long since deported north and across the Euphrates by the Assyrians in 722 BC becoming as they were called by the Assyrians the Beth-Omri (lit. the house of Omri, the last notable king of Israel), then they came north and were know by the Persians as the Sakae-Suni, or in greek Scythians, or in Eastern Europe the Greeks called them, Galathai (milk drinkers) and Romans shortened this to "Gauls" who also lived in Galatia in Anatolia. They retained that name in several ways as they were differentiated by Julius Caesar in his Gallic Wars as those beyond the Rhine the Germani (German) Gauli, or genuine or pure Gauls, to distinguish them from the Gauls in roman territory who lost their identity, largely. Their name for themselves varied, but the most notable come from these names, for example the Saxons (derived from their name for themselves in Persian the Sakae-Suni, literally means Isaac's sons, (I)SAXSONS).
Tribe of Dan or Danites, took the name Dane in the country of Dan's mark, Ephraim became the Angles; Manassah, after his oldest son Machir, likely became what we know as the Ha-Machiri, or American, Reuben, after a king called Frank, the franks, Some Judahites, the Jutes; Levi, perhaps the origin of the Druids; many became know as the Goths (literally God's (people)), settling Spain, Italy (the Lombards), Austria (the Ostrogoths), The Scots, who say their name comes from Scatha or Scythian)..
If you can accept it, western europe, is Israel, who, upon receiving the Gospel of Jesus Christ, have fulfilled His promises for Israel, becoming Christendom, and, as God said to Abraham, in your seed will all the families of the earth be blessed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rwQmimY7R6rb/ - Here's a handy map
I mean, the cornerstone of Jewish, antichrist, ideology is that they are God’s chosen people, and the narrative that the western world is Amalek, is just backwards, they are amalek and we are Israel, can debate the exact nature of that, but that’s the argument that would shatter their narrative
Lastly, I've only lately come to this theory. Practicing Christian for 20 years, undergraduate in biblical studies, masters in theology, read Greek and Hebrew, ordained in reformed Baptist tradition, served as teaching pastor/elder for 5 years, just to give you some background that when I heard this theory i've done nothing but investigate it for the last year, and it has radically changed my understanding of the old testament, new testament, and eschatology. Just for some background.
Mostly agree. My issue with that is that it requires a “spiritual” fulfillment of the promises to Abraham Isaac Jacob David. I understand your point, and agree with the assessment of the “Jews”. I just think that what you’re advocating is replacement theology, which denies the literal fulfillment of God’s promise to Israel. If you allow that the Jews of Jesus day were not in fact of Judah, and that Israel basically populated the western world, Greece through Darda, Troy through Zerah, Rome from Troy through Anneas, the Spanish from Carthage (tribe of Asher and Dan), and the Germanic people roughly from the remnants of Israel.. you can have literal fulfillment of all the Old Testament and New Testament promises to Israel fulfilled in Christendom, and those imposters that “claim to be Jews and are not but are a synagogue of satan” makes much more sense as a cohesive systematic theology, aligning with a roughly post-millennial view of eschatology, and accounts for all the description by the apostles of what the anti christ is (too long to go into detail, but it’s the “Jews”)
Also, I almost mentioned in previous post that the Saxons are named after their knives, interesting that their knife would be called an (I)sax, Isaac’s, since the most notable aspect of Isaac’s history is his sacrifice at the hands of his fathers knife. It’s a stretch I know. However, and this is linguisticly verified, about 30% of all Porto-Germanic is of Semitic origin.
I agree, just for a different reason.