I mean, the cornerstone of Jewish, antichrist, ideology is that they are God’s chosen people, and the narrative that the western world is Amalek, is just backwards, they are amalek and we are Israel, can debate the exact nature of that, but that’s the argument that would shatter their narrative
Lastly, I've only lately come to this theory. Practicing Christian for 20 years, undergraduate in biblical studies, masters in theology, read Greek and Hebrew, ordained in reformed Baptist tradition, served as teaching pastor/elder for 5 years, just to give you some background that when I heard this theory i've done nothing but investigate it for the last year, and it has radically changed my understanding of the old testament, new testament, and eschatology. Just for some background.
Mostly agree. My issue with that is that it requires a “spiritual” fulfillment of the promises to Abraham Isaac Jacob David. I understand your point, and agree with the assessment of the “Jews”. I just think that what you’re advocating is replacement theology, which denies the literal fulfillment of God’s promise to Israel. If you allow that the Jews of Jesus day were not in fact of Judah, and that Israel basically populated the western world, Greece through Darda, Troy through Zerah, Rome from Troy through Anneas, the Spanish from Carthage (tribe of Asher and Dan), and the Germanic people roughly from the remnants of Israel.. you can have literal fulfillment of all the Old Testament and New Testament promises to Israel fulfilled in Christendom, and those imposters that “claim to be Jews and are not but are a synagogue of satan” makes much more sense as a cohesive systematic theology, aligning with a roughly post-millennial view of eschatology, and accounts for all the description by the apostles of what the anti christ is (too long to go into detail, but it’s the “Jews”)
Also, I almost mentioned in previous post that the Saxons are named after their knives, interesting that their knife would be called an (I)sax, Isaac’s, since the most notable aspect of Isaac’s history is his sacrifice at the hands of his fathers knife. It’s a stretch I know. However, and this is linguisticly verified, about 30% of all Porto-Germanic is of Semitic origin.
I'm definitely NOT saying there weren't Japhetite people already in Europe. Lots of Proto-Indo-European tribes in Europe long before the first Israelites from Zarah Judah after the exodus c1400BC began settling in the Dardanelles (named after Darda), Phoenician (Carthaginian) settlements in the time of the Judges c1200 BC, and the Assyrian deportation in 722 BC, as well as many other colonies throughout the bronze age.
There were MANY people in Europe already according to Genesis 10 table of nations:
I should also point out that I still hold to a relatively young earth creation and a global flood. so the cave paintings, and dating methods used to date them, are probably much younger than commonly understood, being the way early tribes lived after the flood. Also, there's good reason to doubt the out of Africa theory biologically, but for sake of time i'll simply say that it doesnt fit with the flood, that modern peoples all descend from 8 survivors (3+1 families) from the Ark which landed either in the Caucasus mountains or Zagros mountains (my theory).
I mean, the cornerstone of Jewish, antichrist, ideology is that they are God’s chosen people, and the narrative that the western world is Amalek, is just backwards, they are amalek and we are Israel, can debate the exact nature of that, but that’s the argument that would shatter their narrative
Lastly, I've only lately come to this theory. Practicing Christian for 20 years, undergraduate in biblical studies, masters in theology, read Greek and Hebrew, ordained in reformed Baptist tradition, served as teaching pastor/elder for 5 years, just to give you some background that when I heard this theory i've done nothing but investigate it for the last year, and it has radically changed my understanding of the old testament, new testament, and eschatology. Just for some background.
Mostly agree. My issue with that is that it requires a “spiritual” fulfillment of the promises to Abraham Isaac Jacob David. I understand your point, and agree with the assessment of the “Jews”. I just think that what you’re advocating is replacement theology, which denies the literal fulfillment of God’s promise to Israel. If you allow that the Jews of Jesus day were not in fact of Judah, and that Israel basically populated the western world, Greece through Darda, Troy through Zerah, Rome from Troy through Anneas, the Spanish from Carthage (tribe of Asher and Dan), and the Germanic people roughly from the remnants of Israel.. you can have literal fulfillment of all the Old Testament and New Testament promises to Israel fulfilled in Christendom, and those imposters that “claim to be Jews and are not but are a synagogue of satan” makes much more sense as a cohesive systematic theology, aligning with a roughly post-millennial view of eschatology, and accounts for all the description by the apostles of what the anti christ is (too long to go into detail, but it’s the “Jews”)
Also, I almost mentioned in previous post that the Saxons are named after their knives, interesting that their knife would be called an (I)sax, Isaac’s, since the most notable aspect of Isaac’s history is his sacrifice at the hands of his fathers knife. It’s a stretch I know. However, and this is linguisticly verified, about 30% of all Porto-Germanic is of Semitic origin.
I'm definitely NOT saying there weren't Japhetite people already in Europe. Lots of Proto-Indo-European tribes in Europe long before the first Israelites from Zarah Judah after the exodus c1400BC began settling in the Dardanelles (named after Darda), Phoenician (Carthaginian) settlements in the time of the Judges c1200 BC, and the Assyrian deportation in 722 BC, as well as many other colonies throughout the bronze age.
There were MANY people in Europe already according to Genesis 10 table of nations:
Greeks (Javan), Cyprus (Elishah), possibly Spainish Celto-Iberians (Tarshish), Mac(kit)onia (Kittim), Rhodes (Dodanim), early steppe peoples/russians (Gog, Meshech (Moscow), Thrace (Tiras), Crimeans (Gomer), Etruscians (Elishah), etc.
However, the modern nations of Europe have all been formed from Germanic (Israelite) Peoples following the rise of Christendom:
England (Angles, Jutes, Saxons, Scots)
Wales (Cimri (literally the Betcomri, house of Omri)
Germany (Germani Gauli)
Denmark (Dan's Mark)
Scandinavia (early Saxons, Jutes)
Spain (Visigoths)
Italy/Austria (Ostrogoths, Trojans (founded by Judah-Darda-Anneas founded Rome))
France (Frankish Germanic)
Modern Russia/Keivan Rus (Vikings, Danes)
Greece (Dorians/Spartans - Danites in the Judges period after their port city of Dor)
I should also point out that I still hold to a relatively young earth creation and a global flood. so the cave paintings, and dating methods used to date them, are probably much younger than commonly understood, being the way early tribes lived after the flood. Also, there's good reason to doubt the out of Africa theory biologically, but for sake of time i'll simply say that it doesnt fit with the flood, that modern peoples all descend from 8 survivors (3+1 families) from the Ark which landed either in the Caucasus mountains or Zagros mountains (my theory).