Back in the '90's a Republican friend was so pro-business he though companies could do anything they wanted, and since they were not unions they were always right. Guess he got what he wanted.
Maybe we ought to buy it up tomorrow when people short the shit out of it, sell the leftists personal information to china then declare bankruptcy and sell off all the assets including that robot dorsley.
I was thinking about this argument as well. If a private company can do what they want and allow, or disallow, anyone to use their service, why can't a bakery refuse to bake a cake for someone that doesn't follow the business's viewpoint?
I grow weary of this "X is a private company, so they don't have to honor our rights".
BULLSHIT!!!
Our Founding Fathers declared in the DoI that "ALL men have certain inalienable rights endowed to them by their Creator".
Look at the word "inalienable" - it means "inseparable", not "inseparable only in the political realm". It means no one - not governments, not corporations, not private companies, not guilds or unions, not even churches - can violate those rights.
The Sovereignty of our Creator supercedes all other authorities and sovereignty.
There is never a time when this is not true. It is true in the home, it is true at church, it is true on the job, at recreation, in the corporate office, and in the government.
The Rights endowed by our Creator are either protected and honored, or they are not.
There is no in between, nor is there any "protected and honored here, but not over there".
If you believe in a Sovereign Creator over all mankind, then His authority reaches into every aspect of our lives.
If you believe our rights pertain only to certain spheres, well, then, you by default limit your Creator to those spheres only.
Perhaps the most cognitively dissonant are those who say our rights apply only to the political realm, but our Creator is restricted to only the personal religious realm.
Back in the '90's a Republican friend was so pro-business he though companies could do anything they wanted, and since they were not unions they were always right. Guess he got what he wanted.
Amen
Awomen
Achicken
Twitter is NOT a Private Company
It is publicly owned by the shareholders
Twitter is publicly owned/traded, but is still a part of the private sector i.e. non- government owned.
Maybe we ought to buy it up tomorrow when people short the shit out of it, sell the leftists personal information to china then declare bankruptcy and sell off all the assets including that robot dorsley.
seems like a private company had to bake a gay cake awhile back
Richard Grenell - Bake the cake...
I was thinking about this argument as well. If a private company can do what they want and allow, or disallow, anyone to use their service, why can't a bakery refuse to bake a cake for someone that doesn't follow the business's viewpoint?
Nobody can do what they want without the approval of Nanny.
Twitter is NOT a Private Company
It is publicly owned by the shareholders
Twitter is publicly owned/traded, but is still a part of the private sector i.e. non- government owned.
And they can't force anyone to bake a cake.
I grow weary of this "X is a private company, so they don't have to honor our rights".
BULLSHIT!!!
Our Founding Fathers declared in the DoI that "ALL men have certain inalienable rights endowed to them by their Creator".
Look at the word "inalienable" - it means "inseparable", not "inseparable only in the political realm". It means no one - not governments, not corporations, not private companies, not guilds or unions, not even churches - can violate those rights.
The Sovereignty of our Creator supercedes all other authorities and sovereignty.
There is never a time when this is not true. It is true in the home, it is true at church, it is true on the job, at recreation, in the corporate office, and in the government.
The Rights endowed by our Creator are either protected and honored, or they are not.
There is no in between, nor is there any "protected and honored here, but not over there".
If you believe in a Sovereign Creator over all mankind, then His authority reaches into every aspect of our lives.
If you believe our rights pertain only to certain spheres, well, then, you by default limit your Creator to those spheres only.
Perhaps the most cognitively dissonant are those who say our rights apply only to the political realm, but our Creator is restricted to only the personal religious realm.
You're damn right.