17
Comments (19)
sorted by:
4
Vashts1985 4 points ago +4 / -0

unconfirmed reports that have been confirmed by military officials.

ok.

1
xkgb 1 point ago +1 / -0

They confirmed the existence of unconfirmed reports?

2
DustCutter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure are alot of military in DC right now πŸ€”

2
DonjuantheDon 2 points ago +3 / -1

Did it last night at midnight

1
Duke65 1 point ago +1 / -0

Airspace over Reagan Airport is on restriction.

1
MooseKnukl3 1 point ago +1 / -0

So it's unconfirmed but it's confirmed that tweet makes no sense

1
Pepper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a single military official has reported this.

1
Opticbirdmaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unconfirmed, reportedly... IN this enviro??? come on man

1
Mr-J 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sources- Dude trust me bro

1
Stonesolo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This has been posted a bigly amount of times.

1
Grimreeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Sources familiar with the mindset of..."

-1
2
KimJung-Un 2 points ago +3 / -1

That same guy said obama was arrested in November lmao lol

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, you tried.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Honestabee -2 points ago +4 / -6

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ been debunked 10,000 times already but let’s keep posting it!

3
_deleted_ 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's been debunked? I haven't seen that can you link me to it?

1
KeizaN 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think it's debunked. It's just pure speculation and no credible source for this stuff.

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not "pure speculation". Words matter here, it's based on hearsay. Speculation is a complete guess, hearsay in this instance is at least two different people, who have heard it from their sources. Their sources in this case are:

  1. Active military

  2. A source which is so reliable they don't require a secondary confirmation

Respectively. Their words, not mine. Now whether or not you believe them is a different discussion, but "pure speculation" it is not.