2499
Comments (55)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
58
Kdiddy 58 points ago +62 / -4

Outbreak started 21, shots 22. Facts.

I’m not getting the vaccine, but headline not correct.

6
snoopy3210 6 points ago +6 / -0

No no no.

  1. the outbreak started in the COUNTY on 21. Not nursing home. FACT
  2. It took some time before people in the nursing home started to die. So OP is right it was after the vaccine was given.
  3. A one day difference makes it impossible to know if the nursing home was infected from the outside or from the vaccine that apparently can make some people infectious from what we read elsewhere.
3
US_scribe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. The article, imo, deceptively leads with the outbreak starting at the nursing home "as a wave of post-Thanksgiving Covid-19 cases began hitting the county" on Dec. 21.

The outbreak started on the 21st in the COUNTY. We don't know when the first cases were reported at the NURSING HOME, but from a quick reading, you would have thought it was the 21st.

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

It also says the nurse who got sick claims to have contracted it there prior to dec 16. That seems unlikely to me, I guess I don't necessarily believe the whole thing about spread from asymptomatic carriers. Is there real evidence for that?

Anyway the outbreak isn't related to vaccination, as pointed out it was too late to possibly confer immunity