nope. nothing you said is impossible the way a hyper loop is impossible. "creating a machine that allows you to walk on the surface of the sun is impossible" that is a valid comparison. "creating a machine that allows you to enter a black hole" that is a valid comparison. "creating a machine to undo entropy" is a valid comparison
creating a machine that uses easy to understand physics of air and lift is nothing at all like the hyperloop. your entire attempt to create a comparison reveals that you really have no actual information on what is involved and you have not thought through the consequences of what was actually proposed.
do you just have no clue what it takes to maintain a vacuum on that scale? hundreds of times bigger than our biggest vacuum chamber? do you not understand material science at all? do you not see the risks of an easily attacked system that where failure at one point causes the entire system to implode?
will it be you stuck in a tube without exits traveling at the speed of sound getting hit by an air wave also traveling at the speed of sounds when there is any failure at all in the system? what happens when literally anything goes wrong and you are stuck in the middle of a hundred mile vacuum tube with no exits?
do you not know anything about turbo fans or thermal expansion or vacuum seals? why would you go through the trouble of creating a system with all the hazards of space travel on the surface of the earth? why would you create a system where one lunatic with a high powered rifle can destroy the entire 'hyperloop' killing everyone inside?
maybe you can ask yourself why everyone was so stoked about it and how it was supposed to be nearing completion now 5 years ago but the best they have managed are complete joke 'test systems' that dont fulfill even the basic promises of the hyperloop over a couple hundred feet.
sorry its an impossible and ultimately ignorant psuedoscience dream.
My entire point was that just because something didn’t work 100 years ago doesn’t mean it can’t be made to work today. All of the examples I gave were towards THAT point, not to the hyperloop in particular.
but there are reasons that 2 technologies were conceived at the same time and one became a huge planet spanning industry and one became some illustrations in a fantasy future science book.
not all ideas are equally possible based solely on their inherent proposals and merits. another great example of this modern delusional pseudo science is solar roadways. driving on solar panels will never be a good viable idea.
nope. nothing you said is impossible the way a hyper loop is impossible. "creating a machine that allows you to walk on the surface of the sun is impossible" that is a valid comparison. "creating a machine that allows you to enter a black hole" that is a valid comparison. "creating a machine to undo entropy" is a valid comparison
creating a machine that uses easy to understand physics of air and lift is nothing at all like the hyperloop. your entire attempt to create a comparison reveals that you really have no actual information on what is involved and you have not thought through the consequences of what was actually proposed.
do you just have no clue what it takes to maintain a vacuum on that scale? hundreds of times bigger than our biggest vacuum chamber? do you not understand material science at all? do you not see the risks of an easily attacked system that where failure at one point causes the entire system to implode?
will it be you stuck in a tube without exits traveling at the speed of sound getting hit by an air wave also traveling at the speed of sounds when there is any failure at all in the system? what happens when literally anything goes wrong and you are stuck in the middle of a hundred mile vacuum tube with no exits?
do you not know anything about turbo fans or thermal expansion or vacuum seals? why would you go through the trouble of creating a system with all the hazards of space travel on the surface of the earth? why would you create a system where one lunatic with a high powered rifle can destroy the entire 'hyperloop' killing everyone inside?
maybe you can ask yourself why everyone was so stoked about it and how it was supposed to be nearing completion now 5 years ago but the best they have managed are complete joke 'test systems' that dont fulfill even the basic promises of the hyperloop over a couple hundred feet.
sorry its an impossible and ultimately ignorant psuedoscience dream.
Dude, I get it. Hyperloop bad. 👌
My entire point was that just because something didn’t work 100 years ago doesn’t mean it can’t be made to work today. All of the examples I gave were towards THAT point, not to the hyperloop in particular.
but there are reasons that 2 technologies were conceived at the same time and one became a huge planet spanning industry and one became some illustrations in a fantasy future science book.
not all ideas are equally possible based solely on their inherent proposals and merits. another great example of this modern delusional pseudo science is solar roadways. driving on solar panels will never be a good viable idea.