11
posted ago by Hiya +11 / -0

Everyone order the smallest, cheapest thing (that you would use). When it ships, do it again. Shipping costs would hurt them or the companies that use them.

Everyone order the smallest, cheapest thing (that you would use). When it ships, do it again. Shipping costs would hurt them or the companies that use them.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
3
Kingoftheroad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wouldn't the largest cheapest thing work better? Cost them more in packaging, take up more room inthe truck.

2
Hiya [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

My wife orders a case of 20 oz drinks almost monthly....shipping must be a lot, but there is a huge mark up on drinks.

2
Lol_bruh_no-doom 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's actually pretty funny if enough people did it in mass

1
1
Hiya [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm, I see it as $0.57... Lol

1
Salty_Dad 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

The purpose of this would be to occupy enough time of the Amazon driver resources that they lose money.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
1134hst 1 point ago +1 / -0

The USPS subsidizes most of the shipping costs for Amazon so you’d actually just be screwing American taxpayers over instead.... nice thought though

1
Salty_Dad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has the USPS posted a profit? Nope. USPS just got $20 billion from the stimulus.