Political affiliation is a protected class, it just doesn't get the same level of scrutiny.
But here we go again with the question, "When has a private entity availed itself of government benefit so much that it should be liable for discrimination practices based on alleged violation of someone's political speech rights?"
Political affiliation is a protected class, it just doesn't get the same level of scrutiny.
But here we go again with the question, "When has a private entity availed itself of government benefit so much that it should be liable for discrimination practices based on alleged violation of someone's political speech rights?"
It's the same thing as Section 230.
I absolutely agree with you and this is an excellent point!
I aim to please.
Lol.