Actually you should read Zinn because you will encounter these revisionists in real life. Some of his sourcing is so bad it deserves to be adjudicated and debunked.
It’s best to know history from different angles. The truth is pretty discernible and anyone who wants to make it neat and tidy usually has an agenda.
I respect what you’re saying. I’m not well-verses enough on my primary sources to do the digging. It’s tough hen I don’t have much time to dedicate to a search. :/
Actually you should read Zinn because you will encounter these revisionists in real life. Some of his sourcing is so bad it deserves to be adjudicated and debunked.
It’s best to know history from different angles. The truth is pretty discernible and anyone who wants to make it neat and tidy usually has an agenda.
I respect what you’re saying. I’m not well-verses enough on my primary sources to do the digging. It’s tough hen I don’t have much time to dedicate to a search. :/
Gotcha. Stick with primary then. Do the best you can is all you need to do.