26
Comments (9)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's more to push Trump supports back to the "acceptable" political party for "conservative" views. The Uni-party can't risk losing the Republican party, so they'll just make the (real) alternative illegal.

They need to maintain the illusion of choice.

2
MAK90 2 points ago +2 / -0

I say they are genuinely afraid of us rising up.

1
Snapplebrisk 1 point ago +1 / -0

More than just that, depending on your interpretation of "rise up".

We still have ,somewhat, the ability to choose alternatives to the "choice" they have provided us. The right, more so, than the left (those guys are hopeless). The right has demonstrated they have little to no control over their "constituents" and it's breaking the charade. Simply put, the masquerade is over.

The Left are going to push through legislation that will silence, criminalize, and demonize the opposition to their control, in the coming months. They hope, that they can bring people back to the republican party by doing so. The "republicans" will ask for your vote and PROMISE that they will work to repeal the legislation. They will LIE and do nothing (as always), and hope by compromising to vote for them once you will continue to do so when "Bigger Problems" are publicized by the media.

A lot of people are wondering, "Will a Civil War Occur?".

I believe we are already in one, we are in an information war, thus the charade is breaking. If we can't recognize the type of warfare being conducted, we cannot counter it. We don't win this war with gunfire; we win it with our wallets, votes, and the ability to spread information. Simple solutions right now:

->Don't let your money go to anything unless you understand who will have it, and what their agenda is. No subscriptions, No Big stores, No One who isn't willing to say exactly what they stand for (essentially large corporations). Then, find every way possible to lower the amount of taxes you pay.

->Do not vote for anyone who you do not trust. It should be clear that republican candidates are not trustworthy at this point. Yes, I assume the candidates I vote for will lose for quite some time, I'm not looking to "win back" the same system I've been in. I'm looking for a movement that will grow, and growing takes time, trial, and error.

->Why vote for a loosing candidate? That's not the goal. We need to be using INFORMATION to start picking off voters from both sides. We need to weaken their source of influence. From this point forward everyone needs to be wearing a body-cam/microphone (hidden well) 24/7, everyone should be interacting with officials in any capacity. They are HUMAN, they can have their own tactics thrown back at them. Character Assassination, Hypocrisy, Conflicts of Interest, Criminality, Lack of Compassion.

We need to get back to that core American Value, SELF_RELIANCE. We don't need others telling us what's right, and what's wrong. That's how we got into this mess, that is the ILLUSION OF CHOICE. There are more than two options, and we need that back, otherwise we live in constant fear and shill our vote to the side that doesn't criminalize our thoughts.

Will there be Violence? -> Yes, but it's not going to help anything.

I believe others will make small scale attacks, they will be deemed "terrorists". This word is fitting, as one must remember, violence with a political agenda is the definition of terrorism. America's leaders are, and have been, considered terrorists by many. In Example:

In several parts of the South of France there are associations formed to assassinate the people denominated terrorists: that is the partizans of Robespierre’s dominion. The Convention have recently enacted a severe Law on this subject. — John Quincy Adams, 6 July 1795

However, I do not believe there will be full-scale warfare. Territories will not be taken, and held. Why? Simply put, the elected officials of the states do not, and will not, back anyone who threatens the "Union" (Uni-Party).

"Terrorism" helps their cause. The more they get to demonize any thought that doesn't align to the two choices they provide, the more fear they instill in the public. In Example:

  1. I believe tax rates should be higher.

  2. I believe tax rates should be lower.

See, the choices refuse to acknowledge the idea that a RATE is poor idea at all. I want a FLAT TAX for anyone above a set income level, which party do I talk to without being called a TERRORIST.

OUR ONLY HOPE IS TO CREATE ENOUGH LEGITIMATE INFORMATION TO SHOW EVERYONE THAT A NEW POLITICAL PARTY IS NECESSARY. ONE THAT REPEALS 250 YEARS OF SHACKLES. OTHERWISE WE WILL CONSTANTLY HAVE TO CHOOSE THE LESSER OF INCREASINGLY TOTALITARIAN EVILS.