Also I don't think the founding fathers had it in mind that rich oligarchs could effectively control the public discourse and ban ideas they didn't like from being discussed by the citizenry, or that citizens should lose their livelihood for stating an opinion in private, totally goes against the spirit of freedom of speech.
Also I don't think the founding fathers had it in mind that rich oligarchs could effectively control the public discourse and ban ideas they didn't like from being discussed by the citizenry, or that citizens should lose their livelihood for stating an opinion in private, totally goes against the spirit of freedom of speech.
That feels, in fact, like quite literally the exact opposite of their intentions