Cloudflare (a service that TD uses) is trying to hold the fort. Their CEOs won't stand listening to the EXTREME LEFT
(media.patriots.win)
🔥🏛️ VIOLENT LEFT 🏛️🔥
Comments (240)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
I wonder why Parler wasn't able to use them.
Parler could use them but didn't at the start. They used Amazon's DNS. That would have given them some more time but staff probably knew they used Amazon anyway.
Many amazon services are extremely pricey. I'm surprised they would go with a pure AWS stack.
Totally true, Gab was bootstrapped though. Parler wasn't. Cloudflare saves you a fortune in DNS lookups, DDoS mitigation and static content bandwidth.
Cloudflare is a layer, really just a large scale reverse proxy. DNS lookups, that's metered with AWS potentially but not with dedicated, etc.
AWS for internal architecture can be absolutely appalling. Some of the metering can make it anywhere from 10X to 1000X more expensive.
For certain services they can be more cost effective based on pooling like shared hosting always has been. People make the wrong assumption though that cloud is always more cost effective.
On top of that they have sinks/drains. The same as the restaurants charging twice as much to ten times more for drinks. The same as the pub charging twice as much to ten times more than the super market for drinks.
There are people out their throwing away millions to AWS just because of a bad choice of hosting or sinking millions into cloud because they wrote come algorithm horrendously inefficiently but instead of fixing it scaling it over loads of machines.
Ahh. So Parler was backed by someone elses dollars to start?
To me, that explains why they seemed to come out of no where and get so talked up
Betting money people that wrote it were an AWS shop (probably Java).
They should have done multi/cloud with hybrid knowing that they were targets from the start (especially if you know your competitor in Gab).
It was a lack of foresight. They'll find someone else. OVH in Europe is probably fine. Otherwise there are bulletproof hosting providers but they cost a bit more.
Parler had huge investment when they started but they for sure got some bad advice. Amazon is woke as fuck, maybe to deflect from their terrible labor conditions and other sleazy tactics.
AWS is for sure expensive but I guess they had the money and it was scalable, however, AWS kicking them off was very likely to happen and it did.
If you use the web based version it's obvious to me their techs aren't all that great. It's glitchy as fuck.
Convenience, that's the word you're looking for. It's convenient to have everything in the same place, but also very dangerous.
AWS is pricey in bandwidth mostly, other services tend to be cheaper, especially if locked for 1 or 3 years.
Best thing to do as a site owner is to build your own stuff on your own servers, that way any VPS or dedicated server will do, and it's easy to migrate between providers.
In theory it might seem like that but I have to tell you on a lot of fronts AWS is absolute hell. Theory verses practice. It's very hit and miss if you'll truly gain that benefit.
i could type a short answer and say HONEYPOT. Geotus is on GAB not PARLER
Apples and oranges. Amazon AWS dumped Parler. That is a web host. CloudFlare is not a hosting service, it is a ddos protection service. Difference between buying a house and a security system.
And cdn and dns.
Cloudflare is a CDN, not a host. The same outcome would have happen to Parler even if they had Cloudflare. Cloudflare is to help with DDOS attacks and being overloaded.